Want clean air?? With all the unhinged alarmism (a gov’t funded prosecution arriving at 50-100 year subjective outcome modeling?), the public deserves exposure to the impartial science rather than engineered narratives (science driven by herd consensus) …Where do we find these Saintly academicians that remain unaffected by large infusions of gov’t green-grant cash??…Freed of the burden of authentic scientific proofs regarding ICE vs EV ‘net’ carbon impacts (why should EV’s get a pass?…), except for the usual ‘consumption preference’ thingy, I’ve yet to see an objective environmental case to be made for EV’s…Personal preference is a different topic…
3 tons