Forum Discussion
ktmrfs
Dec 02, 2013Explorer II
Salvo wrote:
The reason for looking at the smaller thermistor is because it has no, or very little ceramic material surrounding it. The thermistor that we're dealing with has a time constant of 134 s. It's slower due to the attached mass. Still, the small bead thermistor has a sizable time constant.
I could go on with this discussion, but it's really a moot point that we're arguing. The turn-on surge current is not the problem! Regardless if we're using a 2 ohm or 5 ohm device, the energy dissipated in the thermistor is only 35J. The part fails at 1200J. It isn't failing during turn-on. Your argument that the 5 ohm part is better during turn-on is not valid. That is not the problem.
Sal
the 134 second time constant is how long it takes to COOL to 50% of initial resistance with no current flow in free air. I has a very limited relationship to how fast the thermistor heats up. that is an entirely different time constant and is dependent on current and the mw/C thermal impedance. Proper choice of thermistor and it will heat up to the near 200c expected operating temperature in way less than 134seconds. Probably in seconds or less.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,210 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 04, 2025