Forum Discussion
JaxDad
Mar 14, 2016Explorer III
The problem isn't efficiency so much as practicality.
An RV of any flavour is a relatively small space, that means you're never going to be far from the furnace. So noise will be a consideration.
But more importantly electrical power demand while off-grid.
To achieve higher efficiency would require a much longer burn at lower BTU rates and a power venting motor to push the heated air through the more complex heat exchanger. So now you have 2 blowers running (albeit one much smaller) and running for much longer periods.
Furnaces are already big power hogs, I couldn't imagine the extra battery capacity you would need to go this route.
An RV of any flavour is a relatively small space, that means you're never going to be far from the furnace. So noise will be a consideration.
But more importantly electrical power demand while off-grid.
To achieve higher efficiency would require a much longer burn at lower BTU rates and a power venting motor to push the heated air through the more complex heat exchanger. So now you have 2 blowers running (albeit one much smaller) and running for much longer periods.
Furnaces are already big power hogs, I couldn't imagine the extra battery capacity you would need to go this route.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,344 PostsLatest Activity: Dec 26, 2025