road-runner wrote:
I did say that, and upon looking deeper than I originally intended to I see that you are correct. For more FYI, here's what I suspect is an early implementation of grounded neutral detection that used 120 Hz signal injection via a separate transformer: http://www.masterworksservices.com/files/GFCI_by_Sam_Goldwasser.pdf
And here is a chip approach to 120 Hz. signal injection that I believe "could" use a separate transformer, but in practice likely just adds a coil to the current sense transformer: http://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data%20Sheets/Texas%20Instruments%20PDFs/LM1851.pdf
I have no clue what devices use the LM1851 or FAN4147, if one is obsolete, and so forth. Intuitively the FAN4147 sounds like a more advanced approach to me, and a single 2-coil transformer is probably required for the oscillator to work. I suspect somebody did a good job thinking out of the box to come up with this approach.
The LM1851 is what I originally found. I think what makes it the more primitive approach is that absent any feedback, it may not be able to inject the 5mA required to trip the sensor when the neutral/ground short is high resistance. The amplified approach can sense much smaller currents using positive feedback. I agree that this is some clever engineering indeed. These are simple, yet elegant devices that are often misunderstood.