Forum Discussion
24 Replies
Sort By
- MEXICOWANDERERExplorerBack when Stegosaurus were in vogue Cummins authorized use of Fleetgard, Baldwin and Wix oil filters. I have a case of B97 Baldwin filters for the bus. I also use a Luberfiner C750-L which of course is a bypass filter. Without using the bypass filter the Delo 400 would be turned pitch black at 12,000 miles, with the bypass filter, oil would only turn mahogany colored at 15,000 miles. There are various grades of TP on the market. Some, like sold at Smart & Final are single ply and the rolls are very heavy. I wonder if that would make a difference as far as fibers residue is concerned?
By the way, FLIM-FRAM filters allow the oil to turn much much MUCH darker at 3,500 miles in my toad than Baldwin filters do. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what's going on. I have not tried the Ultra-grade Fram. For kicks I measured weight of both filters new and used. The Baldwins end up gaining more than an ounce and a half minus tare weight on a gram scale as compared to a FLIM-FRAM. Wotta hoot! - WILDEBILL308Explorer IIYou use what ever you want. I use Fleet guard only on my Cummins. Please show me where Cummins approves anything else.
Bill - RJCorazzaExplorer
4X4Dodger wrote:
Engine Mfg have run these filters on test benches for upwards of 100k then torn down the engines. The oil drip holes valve guides and seep holes are clogged with TP "dust" clogged with motor oil.
Further TP is DESIGNED to disintegrate with liquid. That will eventually create the very sludge referenced above.
Oil Flow through the filter is of utmost importance and TP restricts flow to a dangerous degree.
TP oil filters are a figment of the 1950's Mechanics Illustrated School of Mechanical Design mentality. They are not something I am going to trust my engine to.
Not a single car manufacturer endorses these filters and some EXPRESSLY warn agains using them.
That is proof enough for me.
What proof is that? I agree that TP filters are not mainstream, nor for everyone. Spewing unsubstantiated claims of clogged engines is the typical reponse, which falls flat when facts are called for. Also for the record TP does not disintegrate in oil - many filters are made of paper and/or cardboard. When these TP filters are changed they are as dense as a brick (and whole). - down_homeExplorer III've I've heard several people, over the years, that used tp filters. If it works for you, that's all that counts.
However cellulose in tp breaks down real easy. Moisture in the air, especially evident, in winter and anyone that just runs the engine enough to get to the store and back it is a receipt for trouble.
Fram use to be a standard. They were sold and profitaibilty was increased as has happened with most successful labels and products formerly made in America.
I use the Motocraft filter in the Ford and Cat Filters in the MH and Mercedes filters in the little car.
The manuffacturer of these filters sell under their labels and others and I will buy them if I start changing my own oil again.
The best filter I have seen is the ones used in Hueys it was several very fine screens in a canister.
Someone use to sell a filter housing for autos that used just one of the surplus screens. I have forgotten the micron size of the hole etc.
If I find one of the canisters from a Huey or other I have thought of installing one in the MH. Of course the rubber seal around the edge of the screen was formulated for real synthetic aircraft oil. It appeared to work on dyno oil though.
You just unscrewed the canister and cleaned the screens sith solvent and reinstalled. - 4X4DodgerExplorer II
4X4Dodger wrote:
RJCorazza wrote:
4X4Dodger wrote:
Fram and Baldwin are both approved and in fact encouraged by many vehicle manufacturers who have no interest in early filter failure creating warranty work. Also All three big diesel engine mfg's, Cummins, Detroit Diesel, and Cat all approve and recommend Fram and Baldwin.
I used Frams on my Mercedes Diesel for years and put 300,000 miles on it with NOT an single engine problem.
To say that Fram is the Yugo of filters is flying in the face of reality it seems to me.
In all my life I have never seen or heard of an engine failure due to an oil filter that was properly installed. The only ones I have known to cause problems are the toilet paper roll ones which have been totally discredited and are NOT recommended or approved by any manufacturer.
This is a typical response by someone with no direct or even indirect experience with TP filters. After almost 20 years of personal use and research, I have never had an issue with these filters. After the chuckling and unsubstantiated negativity are over, no one can point out a legitimate engine issue from using TP filters.
Engine Mfg have run these filters on test benches for upwards of 100k then torn down the engines. The oil drip holes valve guides and seep holes are clogged with TP "dust" clogged with motor oil.
Further TP is DESIGNED to disintegrate with liquid. That will eventually create the very sludge referenced above.
Oil Flow through the filter is of utmost importance and TP restricts flow to a dangerous degree.
TP oil filters are a figment of the 1950's Mechanics Illustrated School of Mechanical Design mentality. They are not something I am going to trust my engine to.
Not a single car manufacturer endorses these filters and some EXPRESSLY warn against using them.
That is proof enough for me. - 4X4DodgerExplorer II
RJCorazza wrote:
4X4Dodger wrote:
Fram and Baldwin are both approved and in fact encouraged by many vehicle manufacturers who have no interest in early filter failure creating warranty work. Also All three big diesel engine mfg's, Cummins, Detroit Diesel, and Cat all approve and recommend Fram and Baldwin.
I used Frams on my Mercedes Diesel for years and put 300,000 miles on it with NOT an single engine problem.
To say that Fram is the Yugo of filters is flying in the face of reality it seems to me.
In all my life I have never seen or heard of an engine failure due to an oil filter that was properly installed. The only ones I have known to cause problems are the toilet paper roll ones which have been totally discredited and are NOT recommended or approved by any manufacturer.
This is a typical response by someone with no direct or even indirect experience with TP filters. After almost 20 years of personal use and research, I have never had an issue with these filters. After the chuckling and unsubstantiated negativity are over, no one can point out a legitimate engine issue from using TP filters.
Engine Mfg have run these filters on test benches for upwards of 100k then torn down the engines. The oil drip holes valve guides and seep holes are clogged with TP "dust" clogged with motor oil.
Further TP is DESIGNED to disintegrate with liquid. That will eventually create the very sludge referenced above.
Oil Flow through the filter is of utmost importance and TP restricts flow to a dangerous degree.
TP oil filters are a figment of the 1950's Mechanics Illustrated School of Mechanical Design mentality. They are not something I am going to trust my engine to.
Not a single car manufacturer endorses these filters and some EXPRESSLY warn agains using them.
That is proof enough for me. - RJCorazzaExplorer
4X4Dodger wrote:
Fram and Baldwin are both approved and in fact encouraged by many vehicle manufacturers who have no interest in early filter failure creating warranty work. Also All three big diesel engine mfg's, Cummins, Detroit Diesel, and Cat all approve and recommend Fram and Baldwin.
I used Frams on my Mercedes Diesel for years and put 300,000 miles on it with NOT an single engine problem.
To say that Fram is the Yugo of filters is flying in the face of reality it seems to me.
In all my life I have never seen or heard of an engine failure due to an oil filter that was properly installed. The only ones I have known to cause problems are the toilet paper roll ones which have been totally discredited and are NOT recommended or approved by any manufacturer.
This is a typical response by someone with no direct or even indirect experience with TP filters. After almost 20 years of personal use and research, I have never had an issue with these filters. After the chuckling and unsubstantiated negativity are over, no one can point out a legitimate engine issue from using TP filters. - 4X4DodgerExplorer II
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
The thought was to provoke the subject not a definitive survey. The Mobil 1 filter supposedly uses a rubber based filtering media. I am not enamored with "Gohner" brand of filters down here. Fram is ubiquitous, I consider the brand to be the "Yugo" of oil filters.
I am getting ready to order filters through Rock Auto, and Mobil 1 looks like it is worth considering for oil filtering. Baldwin as well.
Fram and Baldwin are both approved and in fact encouraged by many vehicle manufacturers who have no interest in early filter failure creating warranty work. Also All three big diesel engine mfg's, Cummins, Detroit Diesel, and Cat all approve and recommend Fram and Baldwin.
I used Frams on my Mercedes Diesel for years and put 300,000 miles on it with NOT an single engine problem.
To say that Fram is the Yugo of filters is flying in the face of reality it seems to me.
In all my life I have never seen or heard of an engine failure due to an oil filter that was properly installed. The only ones I have known to cause problems are the toilet paper roll ones which have been totally discredited and are NOT recommended or approved by any manufacturer. - RJCorazzaExplorerX2 on the TP filters, although these are bypass filters and not full flow. Which reminds me that I need to get one installed on my F250.
<1u filtration, replace every 3000 miles or so for many (many) miles on 4 different vehicles.
For the full flow filters I prefer synthetic media Amsoil filters, which I replace every couple years on bypass filtered vehicles.
In addition to engine oil and diesel fuel, I offline filter (TP) my tractor's 10g hydraulic sump. - opnspacesNavigator III don't know about the orange can of death. I've run cheap Frams on all my engines and never had an oil related failure.
220,000 miles on my Camry before I sold it.
167,000 on my Suburban still going strong,
160,000 on my Mazda MPV and still doing strong, although the rest of the van is a pile of ****)
I've read about how poor the Fram is supposed to be, but I've never had a problem and will keep running them.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,251 PostsLatest Activity: May 17, 2025