landyacht318
Oct 08, 2012Explorer
Increasing Airflow through Condenser.
The new DC only compressor fridge I will soon have in my possession has a 92 mm computer muffin fan pulling air through only a portion(~85%) of the ~120mm tall condenser. It then blows this warmed air directly onto the Danfoss compressor and the electronic controls on the other side of it.
I think it would be better/ more efficient if air flow from the fan flowed through 100% of the condenser rather than ~85%.
The generic fan is said to be louder(25db & 38 cfm) than the compressor itself. I could easily find a quieter fan which moves slightly more air, and also uses less electricity, fabricate a shroud which covers 100% of the condenser's face.
With a reversed airflow I could use this single fan on the shroud to also evacuate the cabinet in which the fridge resides.

I think that if I can use this single fan to pull air from future passive vent in the enclosed cabinet on the left side of the photo so that it flows around the electronic controls, then around the compressor and funnels through 100% of the condenser then through the shroud, then the fan itself, and out of the cabinet that I can ensure maximum efficiency, and minimum battery consumption.
The only valid reason I can think of for NOT doing this is that somehow warmed air from the condenser blowing directly on the compressor is beneficial to the compressor's performance or longevity.
When I saw photos of the fan's orientation, I joined the forum on which it was posted and asked if the person installed the fan backwards but her responded he was sure that was the orientation it was originally installed.
So does an artificially warmed compressor somehow increase it's performance/ longevity?
I think it would be better/ more efficient if air flow from the fan flowed through 100% of the condenser rather than ~85%.
The generic fan is said to be louder(25db & 38 cfm) than the compressor itself. I could easily find a quieter fan which moves slightly more air, and also uses less electricity, fabricate a shroud which covers 100% of the condenser's face.
With a reversed airflow I could use this single fan on the shroud to also evacuate the cabinet in which the fridge resides.

I think that if I can use this single fan to pull air from future passive vent in the enclosed cabinet on the left side of the photo so that it flows around the electronic controls, then around the compressor and funnels through 100% of the condenser then through the shroud, then the fan itself, and out of the cabinet that I can ensure maximum efficiency, and minimum battery consumption.
The only valid reason I can think of for NOT doing this is that somehow warmed air from the condenser blowing directly on the compressor is beneficial to the compressor's performance or longevity.
When I saw photos of the fan's orientation, I joined the forum on which it was posted and asked if the person installed the fan backwards but her responded he was sure that was the orientation it was originally installed.
So does an artificially warmed compressor somehow increase it's performance/ longevity?