Forum Discussion
Salvo
Jun 01, 2015Explorer
The problem you're experiencing in not a fundamental mono characteristic. This is a manufacturing process issue. In general, mono panels are more efficient and do better in low light conditions.
"The blanket statement that monocrystalline panels are better than polycrystalline cells, however, is not accurate. Each panel and its manufacturer should be considered on a case-by-case basis."
http://www.solarchoice.net.au/blog/monocrystalline-vs-polycrystalline-solar-panels-busting-myths/
"The blanket statement that monocrystalline panels are better than polycrystalline cells, however, is not accurate. Each panel and its manufacturer should be considered on a case-by-case basis."
http://www.solarchoice.net.au/blog/monocrystalline-vs-polycrystalline-solar-panels-busting-myths/
JiminDenver wrote:
A 230w poly doesn't crash like the mono in lower light but it limited the array all of the time.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,259 PostsLatest Activity: Jun 01, 2025