otrfun wrote:
Our two Costco GC2's are rated at approx. 200+ ah. However, I'd guess-estimate only about 30-35% (60-70ah) of that is accessible with a 125a load (true since new). The *battery* voltage drop while under this much load is just too high. Our inverter goes into low-voltage shutdown around 10.9v. FWIW, we only have a .15v - .20v voltage drop at 125a (battery terminal to inverter terminal).
It would appear to be a very different story with the LifePo4's. For folks like us, who need access to 125a on a regular basis, we should be able to easily access 160ah (or 80% of the rated 200ah) of two paralleled 100 ah LifePo4 batteries while easily maintaining at least 12.0v while under a 125a load. If the graph that you posted is to be believed, it would seem two 100ah LifePo4's (i.e., Battleborn or Lifeblue) offer a huge performance advantage over our two GC2's.
The discharge curve for LiFePO4 is well established and verified. But one thing to note - this is for LiFePO4 cells. If you are using a 'drop in lithium' then there is also a BMS in the box, and how that handles high currents is function of how the battery assembler implemented the BMS.
As the drop in batteries have a single set of terminals for both charge and discharge, the BMS has to use transistors (MOSFETs) for the charge/discharge disconnect. Depending on how it is implemented, these can add significant resistance to the battery. This would be the reason BB limits the charge/discharge to 0.5 or 1C. The cells them selves are fine with 3C day-in day-out, but the BMS will overheat due to the resistance.
I am sure others who are actually using large banks will chime in, but if you are planning on using large loads, a bank of prismatic cells with a standalone BMS which uses contactors maybe a better option.