Forum Discussion
pianotuna
Feb 06, 2015Nomad III
Hi jrnymn,
Look at the 66 volt trace @ 12 volts it appears efficiency is 94% @ 400 watts. The very best is 97% @ 16.5 volts and about 125 watts.
To me that represents a spread of 3%.
At best for 400 watts it appears that the number is 95%. That represents a 5% loss to me. I.E. far more than transmission losses due to cabling.
This from the page you linked to--top graph called 12 volt conversion efficiency.
My limited understanding is that pwm has no conversion losses--because they do not convert volts to amps.
Look at the 66 volt trace @ 12 volts it appears efficiency is 94% @ 400 watts. The very best is 97% @ 16.5 volts and about 125 watts.
To me that represents a spread of 3%.
At best for 400 watts it appears that the number is 95%. That represents a 5% loss to me. I.E. far more than transmission losses due to cabling.
This from the page you linked to--top graph called 12 volt conversion efficiency.
My limited understanding is that pwm has no conversion losses--because they do not convert volts to amps.
jrnymn7 wrote:
Pianotuna said,
"As voltage rises efficiency of the controller drops. If there is a long run from the panels to the controller some money can be saved by going to series, but there will be losses in the controller. One figure is 98% with nominal 12 volt panels, and 96% with double the voltage. I do not know how low the percentage may drop."
If I'm understanding the Tracer 3215BN's efficiency graph correctly, there is about a 0.5% drop in efficiency at 35v vs. 17.5v, using 280 watts. And at half power (140w), or even at quarter power (70w), less than a 1% drop.
Page 27 of 35
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,323 PostsLatest Activity: Oct 11, 2025