mono vs poly real life testing
Hi folks, This popped up and I thought it worth posting! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ_jrSAk-DU
Forum Discussion
Bobbo wrote:
I took his output for each panel and divided by the square inches of each panel. The Mono was more efficient per square inch than the Poly, but by less than 5%. The Poly provided more power because they were larger, e.g. had more square inches. My take on this is go with the cheapest (Poly) unless they are just too large to fit your area of application.
Bingo, larger could translate into more capture area (??) - interesting, you may be on to something !!
