mono vs poly real life testing
Hi folks, This popped up and I thought it worth posting! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ_jrSAk-DU
Forum Discussion
3 tons,
I don't see it as perplexing.
The 100 watt poly is physically larger which we all knew.
The output when covered is higher from poly.
The output in haze is higher from poly.
The difference in size is not great. The difference in output is higher with poly.
The cost is lower with poly.
So, if I were to redo my system I would move to poly.
And if I were starting from scratch, I would use poly.
The only time mono might be better is if there were perfect solar conditions. But that option was not tested.
I don't see it as perplexing.
The 100 watt poly is physically larger which we all knew.
The output when covered is higher from poly.
The output in haze is higher from poly.
The difference in size is not great. The difference in output is higher with poly.
The cost is lower with poly.
So, if I were to redo my system I would move to poly.
And if I were starting from scratch, I would use poly.
The only time mono might be better is if there were perfect solar conditions. But that option was not tested.
