Forum Discussion
MEXICOWANDERER
Nov 09, 2014Explorer
.4 in occurred at 13.75 volts output on the WFCO = 5.5 watts INTO THE BATTERY
When the WFCO fed the DC to DC converter 177.6 watts went INTO THE BATTERY
Unless you feel the WFCO's potential of 792 watts is somehow insufficient to put 177.6 watts into the battery ? Minus the @ -10% efficiency loss 712 watts allows a lot of room to play with.
Someone is forgetting to include part a) of the equation which is 3,810 watts potential input into the WFCO (meaning AC). Which is sufficient to keep it happy.
When the WFCO fed the DC to DC converter 177.6 watts went INTO THE BATTERY
Unless you feel the WFCO's potential of 792 watts is somehow insufficient to put 177.6 watts into the battery ? Minus the @ -10% efficiency loss 712 watts allows a lot of room to play with.
Someone is forgetting to include part a) of the equation which is 3,810 watts potential input into the WFCO (meaning AC). Which is sufficient to keep it happy.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,362 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 02, 2026