Such theology violates common sense. Sorry. If I, meaning, solo, only, solitary, unique, deem my safety is enhanced while having no conceivable impact on anyone or anything else imaginable then I am going to take the intelligent route. Strong lighting must have extremely strict usage.
For example: High intensity lighting should never be enabled on a winding road where a possibility exists of an oncoming car rounding a corner may be blinded before lamps are extinguished. Same things for hills. If I overtook a vehicle my lights were dimmed A HALF MILE distant.
My eyes are nowhere as good as they were twenty years ago. Asphalt tinted cattle are very tough to make out. A 75-mile drive at 25 mph is ridiculous. Now living in the city I have LED headlights that glare LESS than the correctly aimed factory 9004 bulbs. Yet I can see better. And I do not need to travel now 190 miles to see a cardiologist whose office hours are from 1600 hours to 2200 hours. He moonlighted from the Federal Hospital.
So you see, it's a matter of INTELLIGENCE. Or rather USING IT TO BE BOTH SAFE AND CONSIDERATE.
I avoid driving at night now unless the stupid doctors in the USA force me to have a late afternoon appointment. The trip is cattle free. So is my toad of the light bar. It went bye-bye.
Intelligence! The Other Reality! :)