SlowBro wrote:
Inverter is a WF-8945. Charge profile is on page 7 of this PDF. Charge current isn’t listed, but the circuit branch is I believe only 30A, which the inverter can handle just fine.
The PDF references another document for more details on the charge profile, that I’ll have to check out tomorrow.
https://wfcoelectronics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/8900-Series-Manual-Updated.pdf
Sitting in a car idling with the A/C on, radio going, lights on, uses about the same amount of current the inverter would use, and those kinds of conditions are seen regularly. I believe I should be fine.
https://www.aa1car.com/library/electrical_amp_loads.htm
:R
I know that this is/has been done by quite a few "members" of this forum, BUT, do you realize that this is the same thing as using a "cannon" to swat a fly?
745W = 1 HP..
Your gonna "idle" a large vehicle engine for hrs on end to do something that can be done with a very small portable gen..
One should also realize that the alternator on said vehicle is at MINIMAL charging when engine is at idle.. The alternator should be operated ABOVE idle speeds when drawing a lot of current (as in attempting to charge via a inverter), otherwise you do risk running your starting battery down in the process.
Most car alternators are designed for INTERMITTENT heavy charging, they are compact, have the voltage regulator and the diodes built in, that package gets pretty darn hot under normal use, heat buildup is the enemy..
Getting back to the 1 HP.. depending on size of your engine, you are most likely going to use more fuel than you would with a small purpose built inverter gen. Small gens sip fuel, less than a PINT per hr, larger vehicle engines can consume GALLONS per hr at idle
Your gonna put a lot of idle time on a very expensive vehicle engine and transmission which if it breaks down is going to leave you somewhere that you don't want to be and it will cost you many times more to repair than throwing away a small gen.. Excessive idling also can be very hard on the emissions systems and if a Diesel, something called "wet stacking" can happen and be harmful and shorten the life of the engine.
I personally would never intentionally do this to any of my $50K trucks, too expensive to replace a truck, too expensive to replace/repair engine and transmission (a short block can cost as much as $10K just for the block and transmissions can cost $5K not including labor).. Too expensive and difficult to troubleshoot modern vehicle computerized systems (most mechanics charge at a min of $150 per hr now days)..
Just because it has been or is being done, doesn't mean that it is a good idea to do it.
Buy a small gen and or solar, instead of cobbling up some half baked idea.