Forum Discussion
jadatis
Mar 02, 2015Explorer
The picture of the footprints from capri-racers article give that much more pressure on the ground at the given pressures, that you can explain it by the overall surface minus groves and the sidewals press a bit more to the ground.
Even at the 16 psi most of contact is about 20 psi but even at the edges at the sidewals some spots up to 90 psi.
I also have a pressure loadapacity list from Michelin wich has 3550 kg at 6 bar with 777cm2 contact surface given .
this thoug would mean when supposing bar to be the same as kg/cm2, wich it is almost.
3550/6= 591 cm2 so this would imply that my theory of a part of the load being bare by the construction of tire to be wrong.
But how accurate is this given?
But if you would put the tire on a blunt nailbed it would give the same bending so total surface included the grooves .
Even at the 16 psi most of contact is about 20 psi but even at the edges at the sidewals some spots up to 90 psi.
I also have a pressure loadapacity list from Michelin wich has 3550 kg at 6 bar with 777cm2 contact surface given .
this thoug would mean when supposing bar to be the same as kg/cm2, wich it is almost.
3550/6= 591 cm2 so this would imply that my theory of a part of the load being bare by the construction of tire to be wrong.
But how accurate is this given?
But if you would put the tire on a blunt nailbed it would give the same bending so total surface included the grooves .
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,210 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 02, 2025