2014 Ultimate Heavy Duty 1 Ton Challenge Video

calewjohnson wrote:

JTrac wrote:
I'm a GM owner but sounds a little fishy to me, especially when they say the did some testing at a GM test track. Maybe they agreed to the GMC winning if they got to use the track. Anyway, they need to show the tests instead just doing a condensed version. My personal opinion is they are all good trucks and the differences are not dramatic enough to say one is far better than the others.

This I agree with. Having recently been told by GM customer care that they would not entertain giving me a discount to fix my breaks (ruptured break line on 2005 Duramax - known NHTSA investigation) unless they were forced to under a campaign, I set out to look for a new truck....minus GM. They are all the same, some are refined in areas their competition is not, but they are all good trucks. I can tell you that there is nothing that demands a drastically higher price for the GM. I went with Ford, it had what I wanted when I wanted it and the dealer gave me what I wanted for mine.... With all the HP/Torque numbers being close, it just comes down to how much money are you willing to part with.


Cale

wow that 4.30 rear gear and that engine would pull both a GM and Ram behind your rv and not give it a thought. have you towed yet?

chevman

JTrac wrote:
I'm a GM owner but sounds a little fishy to me, especially when they say the did some testing at a GM test track. Maybe they agreed to the GMC winning if they got to use the track. Anyway, they need to show the tests instead just doing a condensed version. My personal opinion is they are all good trucks and the differences are not dramatic enough to say one is far better than the others.

This I agree with. Having recently been told by GM customer care that they would not entertain giving me a discount to fix my breaks (ruptured break line on 2005 Duramax - known NHTSA investigation) unless they were forced to under a campaign, I set out to look for a new truck....minus GM. They are all the same, some are refined in areas their competition is not, but they are all good trucks. I can tell you that there is nothing that demands a drastically higher price for the GM. I went with Ford, it had what I wanted when I wanted it and the dealer gave me what I wanted for mine.... With all the HP/Torque numbers being close, it just comes down to how much money are you willing to part with.


Cale

I'm a GM owner but sounds a little fishy to me, especially when they say the did some testing at a GM test track. Maybe they agreed to the GMC winning if they got to use the track. Anyway, they need to show the tests instead just doing a condensed version. My personal opinion is they are all good trucks and the differences are not dramatic enough to say one is far better than the others.

RAM

"Exceptionally well on all big distance pulls"

"Strongest most confident and comfortable towing experience"

"Especially liked quality interior"

Sounds like RAM won. :B

Don't tell me, another stupid speed test up a hill.
Worthless to me.

FishOnOne wrote:
deleted

LOL that should have been your first post kiddo :B

deleted