2015 Lincoln EcoBoost vs the Ike Gauntlet

Turtle n Peeps wrote:

In summer it may have been different, but in this test the 6.2 was not waxed, as it had power to spare when the EB didn't.

Where did you get this data? I might have missed it but the only way to know if either vehicle had power to spare is look at the TPS data for the whole run. I have no idea where Moe's foot was at any given time in the run.

If you just going off of the comments of Curley, Moe or Larry let me just post one of the completely wrong comments "Larry" made on this "test": :B

7:18 I never knew GM's 6.2 was a BBC. :S And here I thought GM stop putting BBC in trucks years ago. :R

BTW there is a reason pilots love TC'ers on their engines. They can maintain the same power at altitude that they get at sea level. (at least most of it anyway)
Reading about turbo's and altitude.

As far as the WG setting. On this vehicle I have no idea but with the 360HP F150 they are set just slightly under one atmosphere or 14.7.

More HP usually means more boost but not all the time. My guess is that this engine is running around 15 to 16 PSI of boost. That would put it about 1 liter bigger than the 6.2.

Go back and watch the videos. They state the 6.2 always had power to spare and was never run WOT. They also state the ECO had nothing left.