2021 Ram 3500 H.O.

FishOnOne wrote:

ShinerBock wrote:

FishOnOne wrote:

Huckleberry,
Just a response to your statement a while back and your comment that cummins let's the other manufactures work out the kinks before they jump on board type of excuse. And no problem as I can provide responses to those types of statements as well as cummins has some kinks to work out for themselves right now.
F

Yes, but you cherry picked my statement to suit your predetermined narrative to throw rocks to make this into a brand thing when it isn't. That is the difference between you and I. For you it is always about your favorite brand versus brand another and you think that others think the same way when they don't. Just like the grouping thing from earlier in this thread where you were thinking that I meant something that wasn't even the case.

I don't purposely go out of my way in threads about a Powerstroke just to pi$$ on someone else's engine choice and say mine is better than yours like a 6 year old would. And yes, I think Cummins owners are being childish when they do it in PSD/Dmax threads as well.

BTW, I just want to state here that I grouped PSD and Dmax together because I own a Cummins. I would have grouped the CTD and PSD together if I owned a Duramax or Dmax and CTD together if I owned a Powerstroke. I don't want you to inject your brand warfare way of thinking into my statements again.

The last I checked this thread has nothing to do with a Power Stroke and a Duramax. My interest originally was the news of more power from cummins and for me it's no surprise, but couldn't put the blind folds on the other bs and yes I will continue to call people out like I've done so many times on this forum.

Exactly, this thread had nothing to do with Powerstroke yet some PSD owners found a way to bring it in so I called it out just like you would..... looking at 4x4Ford.