bamafeaver wrote:
I'm looking at the new cheverolet durmax to pull my fifth wheel. Do I really need the 4WD or should I go with the 2WD. If I go with the 4WD is the mpg a big difference and does the 4WD effective the towing capacity. Thanks
I don't think the towing mileage economy, or capacity, is much different between 4-wheel or 2-wheel, if that is your only concern.
If I was getting a new 2015 truck, I'd probably get the 4x4. But if I was getting a used truck, I'd seriously consider a 2-wheel drive unit. The reasoning is that it is true that you get all your money back for the 4x4 option resulting from lower depreciation upon resale. I checked the difference in price between a 2015 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab, Standard Box LT 4WD and 2015 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab, Standard Box LT RWD on the
Chevrolet website, and the difference at my zip code is only $3295, or about $3.3k.
On the other hand, because of the same discrimination, a used 2wd truck will sell for a very pleasant price, and it is true that a set of rear tire chains will outpull a 4x4 without chains in a dirt traction contest. So for a very reasonable investment, one may buy tire chains to save the day in emergency low traction conditions, and even save them for the next truck if desired. Note that very few over-the-road commercial trucks have 4x4. The few that do are usually either off-road oil-field trucks or logging trucks. These hardworking 2wd rely on tire chains to safely continue across slick mountain passes. Note that they also have chains for their trailers to assist in braking and resist jack-knifing.
So we could play devils advocate and list some actual 2x4 advantages.
One advantage, that used to be prominent, was a better ride. In the past, large trucks tended to use a live front axle to provide 4x4, and the suspension was terrible as far as comfort. This is not so true anymore in the 3/4 ton range, but still oftens affects ride on larger brethren to some degree.
Another distinct advantage of 2wd is entry ride height, as it seems all manufacturers tend to lift the ride height of 4x4 over that of 2wd.
One more advantage is that 2wd still seems to squeak out about one more mpg when running empty. The bulk of this is due to the same increased ride height of 4x4, and associated turbulence of the under-carriage, when excess air passes beneath a raised chassis. You may note the front lower air dam present on every vehicle nowadays. It only does it's best good when air is smoothly redirected around the under-carriage rather than tumbling through it. The vestigial air dam part may still be present on 4x4 for show, but it is essentially useless, burning more fuel despite. During towing, the huge frontal area of the RV usually swamps the normal gains made by any aerodynamics of an unloaded "tractor", so there is little difference between 2wd or 4x4 fuel economy while towing.
To be fair, one detriment of tire-chained 2wd is lack of slow steering control in muddy, or otherwise slimy conditions, especially if
a limited slip rear axle always aims straight ahead. This situation can be improved by front tire chains. But no 2wd will ever outpull, and out-control, a 4x4 with chains on a properly loaded front axle. And added benefit can be found by chaining both 4x4 axles, or incorporating all around 4x4 studded tires on ice.
So where will you be driving, and towing with, this outfit? On logging roads or interstates?
Wes
...