otrfun wrote:
Appreciate off the replies!
Once we purchase a trailer we'll probably try it with just the ball as IdaD suggested. I don't anticipate any significant issues, but I'm getting the impression from everyone that some anti-sway control would be a good idea.
I haven't done a lot of research, but it seems most anti-sway setups work in conjunction with a WDH (weight distribution hitch). Are there any simple anti-sway solutions that don't involve the use of a WDH?
Agree WDH's are extremely effective in situations where the tongue weight of a TT may be approaching the limits of a truck's RAWR. Distributing some of that weight with a WDH to the front axle reduces stress on the rear axle, reduces sag, and improves handling.
However, our 3500 has 4,000 lbs. of payload. Based on the 3500's RAWR and FAWR, that full 4,000 lbs. of payload capacity is available on the rear axle and only 1,200 lbs. on the front axle (that Cummins is heavy--lol!). I'd prefer to keep all of the 1,000 - 1,200 lbs. of anticipated tongue weight on the rear axle by not using a WDH. With 2,800 - 3,000 lbs. of remaining payload on the rear axle, rear axle stress and sag are not a concern for us.
Thanks!
WDH aren't just needed by truck approaching max axle weights. I have "tons" of capacity left as well.
What you are going to run into is terrible or even dangerous handling. You will also find that the first 2+ of inches of suspension travel is quickly taken up because it's softer for a decent ride. Your back end is going to sink and the front will be unloaded.
You will find that your truck is being moved around in your lane and that your sawing the steering wheel back and forth to keep centered in your lane.
A WDH isn't just for capacity, it's for handling.
