Forum Discussion
33 Replies
- Grit_dogNavigator II
larry barnhart wrote:
Let's hope nobody dies because of an idiot driving that amount of power. Chevman
Too late....plenty of people turned these cars into future beer cans already.
But then again, a lady turned a message board on one of my freeway jobs into 500 pieces that required a broom and dust pan to clean up this morning. She was driving a Hyundai.
So what’s your point?
Plus I’ve never been over 160 in the SRT. Ran out of straight road too quick, lol. - Grit_dogNavigator II
FishOnOne wrote:
No worries the new Snake will be roaming the streets with 760HP.
Also there's a new Charger Hellcat Widebody about to be released too.
Stop it Fish, you’re killing me!
I rode in a new GT350 and those are what 525hp? It made the wife’s SRT feel slow.
I can barely keep myself from driving a Hellcat home one of these days and now I have to compare it to the wide body’s which are kick a supermodel out of bed sexy! - mich800Explorer
Cummins12V98 wrote:
Mustang really looks good. But I would take the Challenger any day.
Rode in a 18 Charger HellCat it was insane at 707hp. 4 men on board at 1,000#.
Bottom line the Camaro won’t be missed.
Remember you do not need 700 HP when your car is 1,000 lbs lighter :B
I actually have the privilege of driving the hellcats often for work. Fun to drive. But they never let you forget how heavy they are. But I would take one in a second if someone were to give me one. - Cummins12V98Explorer III
- larry_barnhartExplorerLet's hope nobody dies because of an idiot driving that amount of power. Chevman
- No worries the new Snake will be roaming the streets with 760HP.
Also there's a new Charger Hellcat Widebody about to be released too. ksss wrote:
I wonder if the delay is to upfit with batteries and electric motors.
The latest word is that Gen 7 is postponed not discontinued.- Cummins12V98Explorer IIIMustang really looks good. But I would take the Challenger any day.
Rode in a 18 Charger HellCat it was insane at 707hp. 4 men on board at 1,000#.
Bottom line the Camaro won’t be missed. - LessmoreExplorer II
Grit dog wrote:
Cummins12V98 wrote:
IMHO they are the least appealing re-do of the Muscle cars. The rear is simply UGLY. Same person must have designed the rear of the Corvette as it simply does not fit the rest of the car.
Yeah agree. Cool when they came out back in 2010? I tore the rear tires off a rental SS back then. Fun car.
But Ford has always been pretty spot on with the Mustang look after 05 and Dodge hit a grand slam with the Challenger.
Ford did the best retro look job with the newer Mustang, no doubt in my mind. I also felt tha the first gen Mustang...both notchback and fast back...also the '67-'68 Mustang fastback were great looking. The early '70's and then the Mustang ll...ouch... in looks.
The 'late '80's Mustang 5 liter both notchback and fastback...very good looking.
But, most years during the life of the Mustang/Camaro though...the Chevy had the edge in their V8's, V6's power. - ls1mikeExplorer II2018 1LE SS VS 2018 Mustang GT
This 2018 1LE SS is a beast. What is killing it is ergonomics.
From a performance stand point it destroys cars 3 times its price and lays waste to anything GM made before oh say before 2010.
I am a numbers guy and the performance numbers are there.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,043 PostsLatest Activity: Jul 22, 2025