Jay Coe wrote:
Ralph Cramden wrote:
Bobbo wrote:
The crux is whether the word "motor" is in the ordinance referring specifically to recreational vehicles. You have now posted the ordinance WITH the word "motor," and WITHOUT the word "motor." If the ordinance does NOT have the word "motor" referring to recreational vehicles, you are out of luck.
"motor vehicle"for all intensive purposes.
Bwahahahaha! I saw a TV show where someone got called out for saying that but I didn't think any "real" people thought that's what it is!
It's "for all INTENTS AND PURPOSES"!
You must not spend much time online. "Intensive purposes" is almost as common as "defiantly not". Or my own personal favorite, "could of".