Duramax vs Power Stroke Fuel Economy Tow Test and Drag Race

Cummins12V98 wrote:

FishOnOne wrote:

Cummins12V98 wrote:

FishOnOne wrote:
Also noteworthy which is a big deal IMO the fuel tank size:
Ford: 48 Gallons
GM: 36 Gallons

When you factor in the ~1 mpg better fuel economy and 12 extra gallons of fuel that's huge benefit for some drivers.

NOT saying you are wrong, BUT I would not make a bet the fuel economy results are correct.

The GM's lie O meter showed 7.2 VS the calculated 6.9. What were the Fords numbers?

You didn't see the numbers in my initial post?

This was a fuel economy test pulling 30k lbs and reporting hand calculated numbers:

Power Stroke: 7.8 mpg
Duramax: 6.9 mpg

I asked a specific question. You did not take the time to comprehend my question.

There's a link to a video so you can form your own analysis/conspiracy theories.