Forum Discussion

ib516's avatar
ib516
Explorer II
Nov 21, 2018

Every 2015+ F150 engine dyno tested

These are on a chassis dyno, with power measured at the rear tires. Normal drive line losses occur. Gear ratios and other details aren't listed.

2.7L EcoBoost V6 -- 263hp/328tq

3.0L Diesel V6 -- 223hp/392tq

3.5L EcoBoost V6 -- 305hp/351tq

5.0L Coyote V8 -- 341hp/355tq

3.5L HO EB V6 (Raptor) -- 359hp/396tq

All done on a Dynojet.

VIDEO
  • Relax everyone. Anyone who has experience with different dynos knows that they can vary wildly depending on what type of dyno is used.

    Then there is the fact that turbocharged vehicles post lower numbers on certain dynos that do not provide any load or resistance which does not allow it to build boost. If it wasn't an eddy current dyno properly set up for a turbocharged vehicle, then it will probably post lower numbers.
  • I think there is something up with the numbers from the pickuptrucks.com test anyway.

    Maybe a typo. 280/280 from an eco boost doesn't make sense to me. Even if it was really 280hp on that dyno/truck/day, the torque should have been higher than the hp.
  • Groover wrote:
    The numbers for the base 3.5 are quite different from what pickuptrucks.com just posted on their half ton challenge, 280hp and 280lb-ft of torque. Sounds like we need a third opinion to settle it.

    https://news.pickuptrucks.com/2018/11/2018-best-half-ton-truck-challenge-how-we-tested.html#more


    One reason they're different is the truck AmercianTrucks.com tested was the first gen 3.5EB engine with a 6 speed transmission. The truck pickuptrucks.com tested was the second gen 3.5EB engine with a 10 speed transmission.
  • The numbers for the base 3.5 are quite different from what pickuptrucks.com just posted on their half ton challenge, 280hp and 280lb-ft of torque. Sounds like we need a third opinion to settle it.

    https://news.pickuptrucks.com/2018/11/2018-best-half-ton-truck-challenge-how-we-tested.html#more