Expedition vs. Yukon vs. QX80

RSD559 wrote:

marcsbigfoot20b27 wrote:
Totally bogus. Axle ratios weren’t even in the same ballpark.
Go to 9:07 to see the stacked deck specs.

Oh geeeeze......I just looked up the town Dacono.
It’s at 5000 ft.
So both of the non turbo SUVs are down 18% hp.

So, you don't drive in the mountains? Parts of Arizona are high elevation. Power at altitude is important to a lot of us who tow through the Sierras and the Rockies and the Uintas and all of those other mountain ranges I can't remember the names of. How many tow only at sea level?

Most people that RV actually go places that includes higher elevations. Proves to me the Ford is the most capable for such a task. It boils down to personal preference, all 3 are nice vehicle's and it doesn't make a tinker's darn to most if they are a few seconds later.

To me ergonomics, ride quality, stability, comfort, longevity are important as well.