Ford F-250 7.3 Gas Engine Axle Ratios

Hannibal wrote:

Grit dog wrote:
I’d say why would one spend $50-60k on a tow rig with the biggest engine and NOT get the best performance out of it with deep gears.
Not like it’s winding up at highway speeds with the 10 speed.
That’s like ordering a pepperoni pizza because you like pepperoni and opting for less pepperoni...

Fuel mileage is also part of the best performance factor. With a taller ratio, the transmission is less busy, especially with a ten speed. And there’s no logic in making the 1st two gears virtually useless unless you’re going to be rock crawling. Makes more sense to have lower rpm at the top when not towing.
Less pepperoni is healthier.

Nah, bud.
If the first 2 gears were virtually useless except for rock crawling then 4wd trucks wouldn’t have had low range transfer cases since the beginning of time and there would be NO need for diesels with 2.5x the torque as the gassers.
Now, around Tampa, I agree with you, however a new 7.3 10 speed , 4.30s runs right at 2000rpms at 70 mph.
If anything it’s making better use of more gears more of the time compared to a tall geared truck. But what is the intended purpose? Towing, even some of the time, deeper gears preferable. Running bobtail across Montana every day at 100mph, I’d opt for the 3.55s.

Btw if extra ?? is going to hurt you, you have bigger health issues and shouldn’t eat any at all!
Edit, the ?? Was a pepperoni pizza emoji! Lol

Lwiddis wrote:
Do you need a 4.30 rear axle with 7.3 liter engine? Texas is far from the Rockies, Sierra and Appalachians.

Not all parts of Texas! I can be in the Rockies in a few hours.

Grit dog wrote:
I’d say why would one spend $50-60k on a tow rig with the biggest engine and NOT get the best performance out of it with deep gears.
Not like it’s winding up at highway speeds with the 10 speed.
That’s like ordering a pepperoni pizza because you like pepperoni and opting for less pepperoni...

Fuel mileage is also part of the best performance factor. With a taller ratio, the transmission is less busy, especially with a ten speed. And there’s no logic in making the 1st two gears virtually useless unless you’re going to be rock crawling. Makes more sense to have lower rpm at the top when not towing.
Less pepperoni is healthier.

No question, the newer diesels are much more powerful and nicer than our old 2002 7.3 diesel.

I have been told, however, by diesel mechanics/technicians, to BE SURE to get a warranty of some type if I were to buy a newer used diesel three or four years old.

I’d say why would one spend $50-60k on a tow rig with the biggest engine and NOT get the best performance out of it with deep gears.
Not like it’s winding up at highway speeds with the 10 speed.
That’s like ordering a pepperoni pizza because you like pepperoni and opting for less pepperoni...

TECMike wrote:
Thanks for the input, everyone. I would like to think old 7.3 diesel is in good shape. We keep good Bilstein shocks on it, Michelin tires, kept all the fluids changed and never abused it. Garage kept. Most of its life, and has been pulling trailers and highway use, but that are what diesels are engineered for. I probably won't wear it out; it will wear us out!

However, the 7.3 gas engine was engineered for simplicity, hard use, and built with HD parts, I read. I admire that. So it is certainly an option for us if we ever decide to part with our trusty "Bubba". Just wish reported MPG was better.

"Just wish reported MPG was better.", that is one of the reason that diesel pickups became popular. I have had three RAM/Cummins trucks and loved all three. The 2015 no longer has to work that hard pulling our 8K TT back and forth to Arizona. It was paid for before we got on the plane to go get it in Sept 2015, so there is not driving force to replace it with a new gasser that would cost more than we paid for the 2015. You might consider a low mileage diesel that is a few years old. These newer diesel are light years ahead of my old 2001.5 RAM and your 7.3 power stroke. I love my 3.42 gears. It is a freeway cruiser in 6th, yet towed the 16K 5th wheel just fine in 5th gear. In my book, the uconnect system in the RAM is heads and shoulders ahead of Ford's sync system. We have that in our 2020 Ford Edge ST, so I do have a comparison.

Chris

After owning various trucks gas and diesel with ratios from 3.07 to 4.56, I wanted my current truck with 3.55. With the 10spd trans, I have eight gears for towing and a tall 10th for empty highway. Just my preference.

I have 20,000 miles on my F350 single rear wheel 8 foot bed super crew, 373 gears, 7.3 gas engine
Empty taking it easy I can get 16 Mpg Highway, combined mileage between 14 and 15 towing my camper I average around 9.8, any questions just ask I will answer

My 2002 SRW F-250 is a 4X2 also and has the twin I-beam suspension. Very tough and comfortable ride. However, I believe for safety, my next truck, if I buy one, will be a four wheel drive.

Friends of mine, who own them, tell me if you ever need 4WD one time to get you out of a jam, it will have paid for itself.

We love our old Ford 7.3 Powerstroke! Loud, but simple, dependable old truck. Cast iron block and cast iron heads, six head bolts per cylinder, external oil cooler and its injection system sourced from Caterpillar, from what I read.

But the amenities, comfort, and safety features of the new trucks sure are appealing. And the new Ford 7.3 gas engine seems to be built for toughness, simplicity and longevity, according to Ford's brochures.

I hope it is a great success for Ford.

I have the 7.3 with the 4.30. I am very happy with that combination.


Because I tow a fifth wheel, I have the long bed with the 48 gallon gas tank. It is a good combination.

I bought the 4x2 for two reasons. DW likes the ride with the IFS -- very important. Plus, with the 4x2 and the 7.3, we have about 1,200# more available payload than the f-250 with the diesel. While the 6.7 diesel is a great engine, the 7.3 with the 4.30 is a better option for us. About 2,000 rpm at 65 mph. You would not want to be lower in rpm because you are then lower on the HP and torque charts.