"Gidget" Tear Drop Trailer with slideout to be made in US

wmoses wrote:

RobertRyan wrote:
...
My suggestion collapsed it is more manoeuvrable in small spaces, but stretches to allow interior space.

Robert, I hope you are not banging your head on the wall too much at this point based on all the responses so far. Here are my 2 cents.

The front slide makes just as much sense as those US TTs that have a read (bed) slide - interior room is increased while side-side footprint is maintained. In this case even fore-aft footprint is maintained. The point is - space for the occupants is increased even if it does not meet with US sensibilities. The point is noted that since the A-frame already speaks to the lenght of the trailer it might as well be used for a permanently lengthened trailer, but (a) it would spoil the look, and (b) it would present a smaller "sail area" for cross winds, so towing stability will be unchanged.

I have a TT with 3 slides. This means when I get a spot I have to be concerned with objects to the sides, and curved pull-throughs that have trees are particularly a challenge. This little camper has no such issues, but interior space is increased. (Darn, perhaps I am repeating myself).

FWIW - I think it is a pretty cool cute little RV and I think that if it came to the US it would sell well (provided it is priced properly ;)). There are a lot of campers whol like teardrops and this one would be the cat's meow.

Thanks for taking the time to post your picture. I always like to see your posts of the RVs from Down Under. We can always learn from others and your posts certainly help to educated me on how RVers from OZ look at the same pasttime as we share here in NA.
One last question - how much does this trailer cost? ;)

Spot on post from you, that is what I wanted to convey. Price? I did not see or may have missed it on their website.

RobertRyan wrote:
...
My suggestion collapsed it is more manoeuvrable in small spaces, but stretches to allow interior space.

Robert, I hope you are not banging your head on the wall too much at this point based on all the responses so far. Here are my 2 cents.

The front slide makes just as much sense as those US TTs that have a read (bed) slide - interior room is increased while side-side footprint is maintained. In this case even fore-aft footprint is maintained. The point is - space for the occupants is increased even if it does not meet with US sensibilities. The point is noted that since the A-frame already speaks to the lenght of the trailer it might as well be used for a permanently lengthened trailer, but (a) it would spoil the look, and (b) it would present a smaller "sail area" for cross winds, so towing stability will be unchanged.

I have a TT with 3 slides. This means when I get a spot I have to be concerned with objects to the sides, and curved pull-throughs that have trees are particularly a challenge. This little camper has no such issues, but interior space is increased. (Darn, perhaps I am repeating myself).

FWIW - I think it is a pretty cool cute little RV and I think that if it came to the US it would sell well (provided it is priced properly ;)). There are a lot of campers whol like teardrops and this one would be the cat's meow.

Thanks for taking the time to post your picture. I always like to see your posts of the RVs from Down Under. We can always learn from others and your posts certainly help to educated me on how RVers from OZ look at the same pasttime as we share here in NA.

One last question - how much does this trailer cost? ;)

It makes no sense to me. Why not just make the teardrop portion bigger to fill the frame? No advantage to overall length, maneuverability or weight. I guess you need to be a tear drop fan to appreciate it

SkiMore wrote:

msgtord wrote:

SkiMore wrote:
What is the advantage of the slide? The tow length is the same with it in or out.

Well. I'm no rocket scientist, but it appears that the slide will give the occupants more interior room. As is the case with all trailer slides.

This isn't a side slide or a rear slide. I understand why slides normally make sense.

Look at the pictures with the slide in and out. It takes up the same foot print with the slide in or out. It seems to have all of the disadvantages of a slide and not of the advantages. Why make a slide that extends onto the extra long tongue? Why is this better than making it full length to start with.

My suggestion collapsed it is more manoeuvrable in small spaces, but stretches to allow interior space.

RobertRyan wrote:

Francesca Knowles wrote:

SkiMore wrote:
What is the advantage of the slide? The tow length is the same with it in or out.

As is likely true of the weight and, perhaps most important, the wind resistance while towing.

Side-slides add considerable width to living space while parked without increasing drag or of course exceeding width limits on roads. Even hybrid trailers with their fold-out ends provide an advantage by increasing length/space while parked, while keeping road length and weight lower than on a regular trailer. So one can see the gains there, too.

But I'm sorta stumped as to what tradeoff makes it worth the extra steps involved just to get into this trailer-?

Look at the Video it is NOT a side slide, but slides lengthwise , so that is not relevant Notice how the entrance expands and actually makes it easier to get in.

I know it's not a side slide- that's the point.

A side slide actually adds room to the footprint of a trailer. Even a lenghwise slide that extended rearward would do that. But in this case, it just slides up the already extended tongue.

I just don't see the benefit of the design, unless it's just for looks as someone posted earlier.

SkiMore wrote:
What is the advantage of the slide? The tow length is the same with it in or out.

Probably to retain the "teardrop" look.

msgtord wrote:

SkiMore wrote:
What is the advantage of the slide? The tow length is the same with it in or out.

Well. I'm no rocket scientist, but it appears that the slide will give the occupants more interior room. As is the case with all trailer slides.

This isn't a side slide or a rear slide. I understand why slides normally make sense.

Look at the pictures with the slide in and out. It takes up the same foot print with the slide in or out. It seems to have all of the disadvantages of a slide and not of the advantages. Why make a slide that extends onto the extra long tongue? Why is this better than making it full length to start with.

Francesca Knowles wrote:

SkiMore wrote:
What is the advantage of the slide? The tow length is the same with it in or out.

As is likely true of the weight and, perhaps most important, the wind resistance while towing.

Side-slides add considerable width to living space while parked without increasing drag or of course exceeding width limits on roads. Even hybrid trailers with their fold-out ends provide an advantage by increasing length/space while parked, while keeping road length and weight lower than on a regular trailer. So one can see the gains there, too.

But I'm sorta stumped as to what tradeoff makes it worth the extra steps involved just to get into this trailer-?

Look at the Video it is NOT a side slide, but slides lengthwise , so that is not relevant Notice how the entrance expands and actually makes it easier to get in.

travelnutz wrote:
Jayco also makes an "A" frame quick folding insulated hardwall trailer 16'3" including the tongue to 22'4" long and weighs from 1915 to 2385 lbs and it's cheap to purchase here in the USA and Canada.

Sleeps 4 and has a dinette, fixed bed, countertops with sink and 17 gallons freshwater tank and 3 burner range top, drawers and storage, microwave, fiberglass sides and roof, window shades, 4" thick cushions even a 16,000 btu furnace with auto ignition, has standup walk around height when up, NO soft fabric sides or roof or anything on the ground to get wet, dirty, or mildew, spare tire and power roof vents, 4 corner jacks, 12V and 30 amp AC service, 11,500 btu A/C, and gets excellent fuel economy as it's only 62" high when folded down and going down the highways. Compact car very friendly and so easily towed with a little engine.

4 different models and can be manufactured with just the coach or with a large lockable storage box across the front or a rail fenced front porch for bikes, a grill, firewood, you name it. Lots of options and features not mentioned. GVWR is up to 4,150 lbs with 1260 to 1765 LB cargo carrying capacities. Makes a ultra cramped teardrop look beyond silly as it's not much larger than a teardrop but does so much more and all with the trailer and no need to load your tow vehicle full of stuff to haul it! A no brainer if small and very easy towing is what you want!

Actually a different Company to the US one and Jayco Australia makes similar vehicles. We are taking about TEARDROPS not general Trailers. What you have described is why Teardrops have struggled here for acceptance, unlike the US where T&B etc still sells.

Jayco also makes an "A" frame quick folding insulated hardwall trailer 16'3" including the tongue to 22'4" long and weighs from 1915 to 2385 lbs and it's cheap to purchase here in the USA and Canada.

Sleeps 4 and has a dinette, fixed bed, countertops with sink and 17 gallons freshwater tank and 3 burner range top, drawers and storage, microwave, fiberglass sides and roof, window shades, 4" thick cushions even a 16,000 btu furnace with auto ignition, has standup walk around height when up, NO soft fabric sides or roof or anything on the ground to get wet, dirty, or mildew, spare tire and power roof vents, 4 corner jacks, 12V and 30 amp AC service, 11,500 btu A/C, and gets excellent fuel economy as it's only 62" high when folded down and going down the highways. Compact car very friendly and so easily towed with a little engine.

4 different models and can be manufactured with just the coach or with a large lockable storage box across the front or a rail fenced front porch for bikes, a grill, firewood, you name it. Lots of options and features not mentioned. GVWR is up to 4,150 lbs with 1260 to 1765 LB cargo carrying capacities. Makes a ultra cramped teardrop look beyond silly as it's not much larger than a teardrop but does so much more and all with the trailer and no need to load your tow vehicle full of stuff to haul it! A no brainer if small and very easy towing is what you want!