Forum Discussion

guidry's avatar
guidry
Explorer II
Aug 20, 2016

GM Buyback/Repurchase, the end result

Several months ago I posted a question to the group about what GM does about aftermarket items placed on my 2013 3500 Duramax when they take it back via lemon law. No one (fortunately) answered so I guess not many people had gone through the lemon law issue. There was no earlier posts either so I wanted to make one for others. As a summary, my 2013 had several trips to the dealer for NOX sensor issues, two radiator problems and a turbo exchange.

This post is for those who may go through lemon law buyback, or "repurchase" as GM called it. First, any aftermarket items you install (radio, tonneau cover, and even Chevy mud flaps installed by your dealer) will not be calculated for reimbursement for you. You lose! But, there is good news and advice: if you want cash back then they issue you a check and you can go anywhere and get you a new truck, bad news: they deduct mileage you have used. And, their calculations for mileage can be misleading, in their favor! My first issues were at 12,000 miles with the NOX sensors but GM calculated my mileage from the radiator issues at 36,000 miles. So I lost out on dollars in reimbursement. If you decide to trade it for a new truck then GM pays for registration and taxes! And, you only pay for the difference between MSRP prices (2013 vs 2016 truck, in my case). So, financially, the trade was the best deal. And, in case anyone is wondering, my 13' never left us stranded but the check engine light always came on during long trips with the 5th wheel. I loved the truck and towing with it, but with all the check engine light problems showing NOX sensors, radiator and turbo issues, GM admitted it was a lemon. I checked out other trucks but I still preferred Chevy.

The process from GM was not pleasant! My dealer was awesome and submitted the paperwork for me. They were very helpful but once GM had everything, I was alone making calls to GM asking questions about the process, aftermarket items, mileage, etc. Thats where I became mad. GM representatives wouldn't return phone calls, took their sweet time answering questions and one even lied to me, saying he was a supervisor (because I wanted to complain about not getting phone calls returned) when he was actually just a co-worker. Even when I suggested I contact an attorney, they didn't care. They were only a hourly employee handling the paperwork. Finally, when I spoke to a supervisor, I was able to get the ball rolling.

Long story short, if I had to do it over again, I might have just contacted an attorney. In CA it costs nothing to the consumer for the attorney as GM has to pay for them. I know that when you purchase a vehicle (at least in CA) you sign a document saying that you agree to working with GM and your dealer or arbitration instead of an attorney, but legally you can go straight to an attorney if you want. On the other hand, I don't like handing over tasks to someone else because I know only I have my best interest.

This week I finally got my 2016 Duramax and love it. I went with a long bed this time and the ride is smoother because of the longer wheelbase. If anyone has questions, feel free to PM me. Hope this helps answer someone else's questions if they have to go through a lemon law buyback.

6 Replies

  • Umm you might want to rethink that. You have to claim ALL aftermarket parts add on to have them covered under your policy. Now if someone hits you their insurance will cover them. But not your own insurance company. Think I'm worng? call call your insurance agent and ask them. I'm insured with Allstate and had to add my cover to my policy. Since it was under $1000 there was no up charge. But you still have to add them to get them covered.

    Don
  • If they don't consider the value of aftermarket items on the truck, take them off before you sell it back to them.

    Insurance companies consider the value of aftermarket items in the valuation of your vehicle, if your vehicle is totaled in an accident/theft/etc event. I've had 2 vehicles totaled and I was paid for the value of my aftermarket parts both times.
  • I know in Ohio all dealer installed options are covered under the LLBB (lemon law buy back). Anything you install or have installed you must leave on if the item is fastened with screws, welded or glued to the vehicle. Unless the manufacture buys off on you removing it.

    A manufacture can require you to use binding arbitration if you are accepting a discount like rebates, special zero percent financing, friends and family discounts and or employee discounts. From what I was told by an Attorney friend was that the document you sign is binding. But it does not keep you from getting an Attorney and filing under the States lemon laws.

    You just must show that the manufacture was not working with you in a timely fashion. So document, document, document every date and name of every person you are talking with and keep those records!!! Your best bet is doing everything in writing or email as then you have a copy that can be used in court. Showing up with a well documented case will get you what you deserve.

    Don
  • trail-explorer wrote:
    If I encountered a major issue with my truck warranting a buyback, I too would go right back and buy another GM truck, The D/A combo is just an awesome powertrain.

    I can't wait to see the 2017s.


    Right?
    Can't wait to see if they step back into the diesel power wars!
    My bone stock LB7 with just a healthy canned tune was a friggin rocket. Having that kind of power stock with a warranty is COOL!

    Only in 'Murica can you run down and buy a 6-700hp factory hot rod and a truck with close to semi truck towing power right off the same showroom floor!
  • If I encountered a major issue with my truck warranting a buyback, I too would go right back and buy another GM truck, The D/A combo is just an awesome powertrain.

    I can't wait to see the 2017s.
  • Is the California lemon law an arbitration process? Was reading the highlights of Florida's statute, If a vehicle owners successfully pursues an action, the manufacturer of the vehicle has the option of issuing a cash refund for the purchase price or providing the claimant with a replacement vehicle. No mention of depreciated value for mileage, but the statute does say there is no reimbursement for any equipment or features not installed by the manufacturer. If it does come down to pursuing refund/replacement, it is an arbitration process, not a court proceeding, so apparently the attorneys lose out..........