Forum Discussion
- spoon059Explorer III'd like to see MDT and HDT tractors on this test. I mean, that would prove or disprove that they have "STRONG" frames... right?
- BedlamModeratorI would like to see the same tests with the big three trucks loaded at capacity. Ford had an issue with front body mounts causing radiator damage in pre 6.7 engine trucks. This would show whether the trucks could traverse uneven ground when loaded without damage.
Anyone parking or loading a vehicle on such uneven ground needs more education rather than a stiffer frame. - mich800ExplorerMaybe there is merit to that test. But it doesn't apply to how I use my truck. I do have one question. Is this a problem that needs to be solved? I.E. do contractors or others that use their truck in the field park them in a situation where one or two wheels are off the ground and need to unload? It seems if you are in that precarious of a position it would not be a safe place to load/unload.
- Ron3rdExplorer IIIWhoever does the test wins!
(All frames are designed to flex BTW) - spoon059Explorer IIHA!!! I remember a couple years ago when the Ford faithful were bashing the Tundra for a similar test. The Tundra's frame is weak, you are going to see piles of them on the side of the road (small piles... they have a small market share... but piles nonetheless!).
Now that GM is doing the same test that shows the Ford frame flexes... suddenly the Ford faithful realize the test is ridiculous.
All these video's do is create worthless propaganda for the ignorant masses. This "test" doesn't prove anything. Metal fatigue will cause a frame to fail. Built in frame flex will prevent fatigue, leading to a frame that is more durable.
Bottom line, these trucks are engineered for specific weights and longevity. So long as you use your vehicle within the means, you will be fine. Don't tow 30,000 lbs with a Tundra... it should last a long time. Don't tow with only 2 opposing wheels on a F250... it should last a long time.
These "tests" are pandering to the dumbest customers who favor blind brand loyalty over common sense and truth. - FordloverExplorer
camperforlife wrote:
BB_TX wrote:
I guess if I took my truck rock climbing that might mean something.
Umm, back in the days of the farm, I torqued the bed many times where the tailgate wouldn't open. Did it on Fords and Chevy's and I'm not so sure that the frames are stronger today than they were 15 years ago.
Free hint to anyone who experiences this problem: Open tailgate before you park on seriously unlevel ground. - FordloverExplorer
FishOnOne wrote:
Enjoy....
Link
Howie Long "We're going to be going up against the 2015 Ford F-250, supposedly our competition"
They aren't exactly sure who their competition is. That is very important in any market when you aren't the only product available.
Any good off road guy will tell you the more flex a vehicle has the better it will do. The most fundamental concept in off road driving is to keep constant contact of all 4 tire patches on the ground. Hiking a tire up in the air 3 feet might look cool, but much like drifting a car, it's all for show not go. - goducks10ExplorerDidn't Ram beat the Ford a while back too. Granted they were 2014's, so maybe the 15's will be better. It's just another game of leap frog for the big 3.
- Cv67chengExplorerSame old propaganda garbage. None of the big three are really better than the other. I have never had a need to open my tailgate while traversing a ditch and frankly, I would rather have a frame that flex's a bit when off roading.
- camperforlifeExplorer
BB_TX wrote:
I guess if I took my truck rock climbing that might mean something.
Umm, back in the days of the farm, I torqued the bed many times where the tailgate wouldn't open. Did it on Fords and Chevy's and I'm not so sure that the frames are stronger today than they were 15 years ago.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,025 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 06, 2025