I wish Ram would have put a cheat device on my truck. I'd delete it myself if I didn't have to test it every other year.

"The complaint underscores questions about the credibility of diesel technology"had to laugh at that one.. perhaps we should examine the credibility of the paid for EPA and their protectionist standards ?

TexasChaps wrote:"The complaint underscores questions about the credibility of diesel technology"had to laugh at that one.. perhaps we should examine the credibility of the paid for EPA and their protectionist standards ?It makes me think about unreasonable mandates. Who might have more experience with physics, the engineers or the career politicians and eviro wackos? They didn't do any of this just to be evil and criminal. They may be up against unreasonable demands that would remove the products from our use. There is an agenda and it doesn't include us doing what we are doing.

I have to wonder how much pollution is estimated to come from vehicles, as opposed to chemical companies, power companies, manufacturing, etc. Seems its easier to put strict regulations on vehicles, which may or may not be the primary cause of pollution, and ease up on commercial enterprises.We have gotten to a point where the air is substantially cleaner, and that is something for which we should all be grateful... but to make the regulations more and more draconian doesn't seem like the right way to do it.

It will get interesting, the Government went out of its way a few years ago to declare preferred stockholders shares worthless and then largely gave the company to the unions, is the same Government now going to slam the unions for what they have done with their free booty?