JimK-NY wrote:
HMS Beagle wrote:
Before this I had the BF 9.6 with the aft wet bath. I was Ok with it, the wife was not. The dinette was larger, but not much more comfortable - still flat seat bottoms and upright backs. The 10.4 also has a lot more storage. I've gotten used to the nice stall shower and the extra storage.
I certainly would not want to argue about this. You are happy with a dry bath but not the size of the dinette. I am happy with a smaller wet bath and glad to have have some of that extra space go to a dinette that is U shaped with the back area over 6.5' long. There is plenty of leg room and also room for a large table on a Lagun support. Each of us has a vested interest and cannot undo the choices. Perhaps someone reading this and trying to make a decision on a camper will be able to make a decision that matches their needs.
It is interesting to see everyone's preferences. We tried a U shape and hated the narrow leg room do to the seating on the back side. It just just forced us to keep our knees clamped together. Then found our Okanagan with the face to face table and loved it. But it is located in the rear, across from the kitchen and doesn't have that clipped corner like the OP's. That would drive me nuts.
Looking forward to seeing the table solution. And I like the idea of sloping the seat a couple degrees for comfort. That be easy to do for most campers, I'd guess.
