"Jack" digital antenna
Has anyone installed one of these digital replacement antennas: http://tweetys.com/jack-digital-hdtv-antenna-w-built-in-signal-meter.aspx I like the idea it doesn't have to be cranked up and ha...
Forum Discussion
wmoses wrote:I did an Apples to Apples comparison Jack to Batwing, with and without the Wingman. I'm on an iphone otherwise I'd post the link, but someone posted it around the beginning of this thread. Check it out and you'll see why I keep saying that.SCVJeff wrote:
I sound like an Winegard employee (I'm not), but I'll say it again.
With that kind of a difference between the two, the batwing clearly had a problem. All things being equal you should have had the same or slightly less on the Jack.
SCVJeff - I take it you are basing that stance on the "batwing" vs the non-elevated Jack antenna, correct? If that is the case then I can agree.
However I am interested in the Jack head replacement that sits just as high as the "batwing" since it is installed in place of the "batwing" on top of the mast and is also rotatable as is the "batwing".
In that scenario, assuming the "batwing" had no problem and all other things being equal, what would be the basis for your assertion that the "batwing" would still be superior to the Jack, espeically in the face of these testimonials that, after replacement, they got better reception and more channels?
