itguy08 wrote:
Always said GM made a good vehicle. As does Ford. You don't become #1 and #2 in sales by building junk.
Also, look at the Chrysler Corp. groupings, including Ram. At the bottom of the pack. I thought "the quality issues would be fixed by 2011"? Some things never change.
Nah, Rams a joke, ugly, unreliable engine, no tranny, low GVWR and GCWR numbers, an ugly truck inside and out....can't believe you'd even bring it up unless doing your typical trolling of Chrysler/Ram products that most know you excel at and "lay in waiting" to do....Go after the #2 Chevy/GM products that this topic is actually about.....Chevy/GM, especially with the durability/reputation of GM being able to actually use the same engine in it's truck since it's 2001 inception of being able to use the same diesel, only modifying it and making it more powerful and being very successful at doing so, Also MUCH can be said about the Allison, one of the best medium duty tranny's out there...but, thats one of those things that go without saying......Hard to beat these twins with the reputation they have earned, being, year after year after year, consistant and great trucks, not having to change engines because they may or may not have made a mistake...I agree with you CONGRATS to the GM Twins, (though, I DO prefer the Chevy...sorry GM guys:)).
I know, poor ole Ram, stuck with the pathetic, 6 banger medium duty diesel engine and a medium duty tranny (Aisin), oh well, maybe one day, they'll be able to compete with your beloved Ford....just like the GMC twins are trying to do...one thing about it GM and Ram have room for improvement....that's a good thing.:)..Thank goodness they don't have to keep trying to figure out which engine to use...guess they've been really "lucky" with this one...
.........need to try to stay on topic.....
I prefer the Chevy over the GMC, more afforadable and it's the same vehicle cept for some fancier badging.
