W.E.BGood wrote:
I got a Garmin 2797LMT last year in preparation for our trip to California. I'm a hard-copy roadmap/do-lots-of-Google-maps-research-beforehand kinda guy and I was glad I kept that discipline. The Garmin was nice for some things especially locating gas stations, restaurants and such things up ahead. For route planning I think it sucks...it took us right through downtown Portland, OR during afternoon rushhour instead of routing us around town on the interstatevbypass. Another "failure" was as others noted, it sent us on a backroad that had been closed for months due to a bridge being washed out...and yes, I'd done all of the "updates" just before we left. Also, some gas stations had obviously been shuttered for years when we got to them. Bottom line is I don't trust or believe ANY GPS for accurate routing ALL of the time. It doesn't know if a road just flooded up ahead, and it sure as heck won't tell you that you can't get through a McDonald's driveway.
As a point and shoot device all GPSr's ate very bad since there is know way for them to know current road status and they ignore roads with traffic lights. But then paper maps have the same problem.
We use Garmin and build our routes on the laptop computer, review them with Google Earth; which isn't always up to date; then up load the routes to the GPSr. Also high light the route(s) on paper maps.
A review of road conditions on state dot 511 sites will avoid 90% of the problems but not all.
It is difficult for everything to be kept up to date....look at last springs floods in TX.