Now for the "rest of the story"
First and foremost here is the link to the facts gentlemen, not he said she said and they wrote :R CLICKY CLICKY FCA Clarifies Scope of Remedies in NHTSA Consent Order July 27, 2015 , Lon...
Forum Discussion
Ductape wrote:
That is a PR statement by a business under a consent order.
Posted by someone with a financial interest in the outcome.
IMO forum members will need to determine the facts to their own satisfaction. Which will be challenging with all the brand advocacy we know and love.
I owned a 2011 that was recalled and inspected for a tie rod issue. I have since traded it in; I had no dislikes of the truck, it was a nice ride. It did develop DW around 40k miles. Traded in so I didn't get that diagnosed.
Entirely uncalled for remark against the OP and his intent. Just because some one works for that particular company does not mean he has any input regarding corporate policy. Posts like yours helps no one. The mad/adm needs to remove it IMO.
Thanks Don for posting from the actual source instead of the usual blown out proportion unchecked hype we get from the press much of the time.
Maybe some one can post what exactly the issues are for each year model truck like we use to pull or carry our RV with and what the actual fix is.
We sure don't need anymore posturing or other immature remarks like we've had so far.
