ShinerBock wrote:
I know you didn't, and I wasn't talking about that. I was referring to the "Ford is perfect and better in every way and everything I have is the better than anyone else's" mentality that you and another Ram owner here has about Ram and Cummins products(you know who I referring to). I can understand liking a brand, but it comes off as a bit too fanboyish especially when it gets to the point when all logic and rational goes out the window. Thinking that a truck make is perfect in every way is irrational. Only focusing on the negatives of somethings else while turning a blind eye to the negatives of what you have is irrational.
I am with you on liking what you got because you should be proud of what you have earned, but I am against you when you want to piss on what everyone else has just because it is not a Ford or just because it is a Cummins. I agree with you up until you get to that point.
^^Good post.
As to mileage, it's just approximate info as far as I'm concerned. Too many variables for each tank burned, i.e. Payload, wind, terrain, different addatives, etc to be accurate down to the tenth consistently.
And just to add fuel to the fire concerning where an engine is most efficient; what moves a load? Horsepower or torque? Torque is mentioned here most, but reguardless of where you are in the torque curve, it takes the same amount of HP to move it right? Bringing it home to this topic, the question is, how much fuel do the various configuration of our trucks burn to make that HP at different RPM, in different gears, at different speeds. I will happily tell you what my truck averages for MPG's, but I won't get into a contest with another's, because he doesn't/didn't drive his exactly where, and how I do. Hope all that made sense :W
To the OP, happy for you. Enjoy that truck!