itguy08 wrote:
brulaz wrote:
You're losing all credibility and wasting everybody's time, including your own, with troll-ish comments like this.
I suppose the truth hurts? Chrysler has been producing subpar vehicles for pretty much their entire existence. The numerous places that track long term dependability show them to be subpar today and in the past. If those facts hurt my credibility, than so be it. But the facts are that Chrysler does not make reliable vehicles.
The "facts" as you see them are nothing more than your opinion, and bear little resemblance to reality. I do Government fleet maintenance, and the oldest vehicles in the fleet are all Chrysler products. Every single one of them. We have several late '70's trucks in our fleet, and even a '74 Dodge W-200 truck. They have not yet used up their monetary allowance for parts replacement, as is the main criteria for sending them to auction. Each vehicle has an allowance. When the money runs out, they are sold off at auction. These Dodges have outlasted their GM and Ford counterparts by decades, not just years. I like all the big three brands, but for long term cost of ownership, Truthfully, Chrysler wins hands down.