IdaD wrote:
Failed statistics in college, huh? Ford probably sells 50 times as many vehicles a year as Lincoln, but you just did a straight average between the two to figure your "corporate" dependability? Ditto Ram vs Fiat. Good grief man, that's a pathetic attempt at "analyzing data."
Thanks for the graphic you posted, though - nice to see Ram up that high on the list.
Moving the goalposts because you don't like the data? The entire world knows a Lincoln is a Ford with more sound deadening. The drivetrain and other bits are the same as a Ford. Similar story with GMC vs Chevrolet. The one interesting thing is to see the "premium" brands like GMC, Lincoln, Lexus, do better than their standard counterparts.
You can see who sold what here:
September 2015 SalesHow should we do it? Weighted average? That would also look bad for Chrysler as they sold a lot of those abysmal Jeeps, lots of bad Dodges, and a few mediocre Chryslers and some decent Rams...
So how should one analyst the data? Straight line average seems to be the best to me for all makers....