HMS Beagle wrote:
theoldwizard1 wrote:
IMHO, AGM batteries are not worth the additional cost EXCEPT - You have an application where the battery may sometime be on a severe angle
- location of the battery is such that regular maintenance can NOT be performed
AGMs are also useful in two other situations: 1) you do not like the outgassing and corrosion that flooded cells produce, 2) they are not charged for some period of time, such as a seasonal layup.
I'll add another reason, (related to the severe angle mentioned above) - though it won't affect most people here. If you have a very small camper with very limited battery space, the ability of an AGM to be stored on its side might be significant. My battery compartment is small but by fitting an AGM and mounting it on its end (like a tower) I can get a larger capacity battery to fit.
Plus they tend to be tolerant of lower states of discharge. According to the specification sheet for my AGM battery it can accept something like 500 discharges down to a mere 20% state of charge. I rarely boondock, but when I do, having a compressor fridge was really proving too much for the old 80 Ah battery that was the largest I could fit in the battery compartment - that gave me 40 Ah before it was at 50% SoC and that was killing it as it was a cheap battery not designed to be dropped that low. The replacement AGM (mounted in an orientation I couldn't mount a flooded cell battery) is 105 Ah. Combine that with it accepting a lower state of charge and I have doubled my reserve battery capacity for the rare times when I do need a bit more than 40 Ah.
So we tick several of these boxes that justify the expense of AGM batteries (and already had built in chargers that are designed to handle AGMs, so no extra cost upgrading there). But I suspect few people would have the same limitations we have and would therefore find flooded cell batteries much more economical.
Steve.