ShinerBock wrote:
Yosemite Sam1 wrote:
I'll say let me them.
My neighbor used to be a polluting, noisy and smelly steel plant. I guess they moved somewhere to Midwest.
I'm not shedding a tear over it. Specially that Amazon took over their property.
Many of those named in that articles were not "smelly plants". They were cooperate headquarters of manufacturing companies. But hey, if it makes you feel better to eat sour grapes then by all means.
Also, population density plays a big role in increasing local pollution. Much of southern California's pollution problem is their own doing and the same environmental issues are not shared throughout most places through out the US so they don't need the same emissions laws. But instead of moving and spreading out to lessen the local pollution that are causing the health, the self righteous hypocrites want to move their pollution to someone else's backyard (while still enjoying the benefits) so they don't have to be set back.
May I recommend that you should just stick to what you know? lol
My neighbor's, and hunting buddy, daughter worked there. She lost her job as plant-supply chain manager but get a higher paying new gig with Amazon.
And what are you talking about "higher population density" is causing pollution? In California? Where if you want to develop tracks of land, usually bare desert, for housing, you have to plant trees along roadways and pathways, reserve a good portion of it complex for green area and semi-forested parks and currently, new homes are with built-in solar paneled roofs, otherwise it would not sell?