ShinerBock wrote:
Yosemite Sam1 wrote:
Another adage that you might want to get wisdom from: If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
I don't find myself in holes because I have enough sense to foresee problems and find solutions instead of sticking my head and one pretending that no problems exists.
Yosemite Sam1 wrote:
1. Direct knowledge, where his daughter actually presided over the plant's decommissioning is better than your crystal balling.
Again, the plant you speak of has no bearing on what I was talking about so it does not matter who has direct knowledge of what.
Yosemite Sam1 wrote:
2. Air quality actually improve in urban green zones -- even if surrounded by residential area.
That is not what I hear like most "feel good" ideas that is backed by no data.....
Greener But Not Cleaner? How Trees Can Worsen Urban Air Pollution
The CO2 that trees consume is not an mediate health risk. NOx and PM is a mediate health risk, and trees do not consume these. Mainly areas with high population densities have issues with these two health risks. Most rural areas away from these metro areas don't have enough of a concentration of them to be a health risk.
Okay, okay, we are all going to die -- eventually. Happy now?
OMG, somebody said here, arguing with you is a lot worse than arguing with his wife.
I just but agree and worst -- like the wife is drunk or something.