Forum Discussion
otrfun
Sep 10, 2016Explorer II
We put 50k on a 2012 5.7 Tundra we purchased new. The '12 has almost the identical engine/tranny/suspension as the '13-'16 5.7---not sure if they made any changes for '17.
Used the Tundra to tow a 7k (CAT scaled, loaded) bumper-pull toy hauler on a 5,000 mile, cross-country trip, several times. The Tundra was within 100 lbs. of its maximum payload towing the above rig (CAT scaled). On smooth roads the suspension was fine. On rough, interstate expansion joints (i.e., I10/I12 in Louisiana) the suspension would bottom-out occasionally. 8-9 MPG's (hand calculated) at 60 MPH. It had decent power, handled good, but it wasn't the effortless tow experience that others have described.
FWIW, if you plan to tow more than 5k with a Tundra, I would highly recommend purchasing the 5.7 V8. The smaller 4.6 V8 is much less capable in terms of HP, torque, and tow capacity.
Good luck!
Used the Tundra to tow a 7k (CAT scaled, loaded) bumper-pull toy hauler on a 5,000 mile, cross-country trip, several times. The Tundra was within 100 lbs. of its maximum payload towing the above rig (CAT scaled). On smooth roads the suspension was fine. On rough, interstate expansion joints (i.e., I10/I12 in Louisiana) the suspension would bottom-out occasionally. 8-9 MPG's (hand calculated) at 60 MPH. It had decent power, handled good, but it wasn't the effortless tow experience that others have described.
FWIW, if you plan to tow more than 5k with a Tundra, I would highly recommend purchasing the 5.7 V8. The smaller 4.6 V8 is much less capable in terms of HP, torque, and tow capacity.
Good luck!
About Travel Trailer Group
44,030 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 04, 2025