rbpru wrote:
I think after 27 pages of rhetoric the best thing to do now is to divide into two groups.
1. Those how think driving fast, (65+) is bad.
2. Those who think driving fast is okay.
It is rather obvious that neither group cares what the other group thinks; they are going to do as they please.
Perhaps the best thing each group can do is pray for the well-being of the other group. Certainly cannot hurt.
That is not true. I would be classified as more in camp 2 but I do respect the opinion of those in camp 1. The problem and reason this thread has drug on is due to the fact an inaccurate use of an accident to support camp 1. It is not ok to use a picture of a fatal accident to play on ones emotions to persuade the other side when that accident had nothing to do their position.