Why are TCs so much better than class C?
If there was a good 4x4 class C I might reconsider buying a TC. I saw Phoenix Cruisers have a 4x4 option but I can't understand why their features are not as good as TCs. Given that class C is buil...
Forum Discussion
udp8 wrote:poncho62 wrote:
I think the question the OP is asking is why dont they make a 4x4 Class C?
Not exactly; more like why, with the more uninhibited space available to class C designers (no truck bed in the way), why don't they make class C with the amount and size of amenities and features anywhere near a TC? Then if you add the 4x4 requirement, the options become far, far fewer. And the cost doesn't turn out to be better, either.
kohldad's post above sums it up pretty well too.
Why would I pay more and get less LPG capacity, more awkward dinette, smaller water tanks, no slideouts, smaller refrigerator, and have to fold my (smaller) bed down every day? Not to mention to come close in a class C you have to go quite a bit longer length-wise. It doesn't add up to me. Same applies to Tigers.valhalla360 wrote:
If you don't care about off roading (the vast majority of RV'ers), a standard class C provides far better accomodation for the money
But I'm not seeing this to be true. Maybe Phoenix Cruisers are the expensive side of class C? (Tigers certainly are)
If class C was substantially cheaper, the sacrifices could be worth it for some people, and yes, you can take it to Quigely and have 4wd added for less than $10k.
Must be different out there. A small 20-24' class C is typically less than a truck camper with truck but has a much more spacious interior (admitedly, some of that is the apperance of space)...hence you get more space for the money.
