Forum Discussion
164 Replies
NJRVer wrote:
This part of the reason a national sales tax could be used for roads. The trucks move the products consumers buy.
Majority of road degradation comes from heavy trucks so it only makes sense they pay to rebuild them.
Somebody's Equinox or Escape isn't tearing up the highways.- NJRVerExplorer
wilber1 wrote:
NJRVer wrote:
wilber1 wrote:
NJRVer wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
time2roll wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
Really? What line on your 1040 relates to the EV surcharge?
Because they are taxing me to fund a rebate for you to buy one...you want to buy one, fine...if the company survives, great...but when you make me pay for it, I get say.
BTW any tax credit to Tesla Buyers ENDS December 31, 2019.
Others beat me to it.
Even with the tax credit coming to an end (tesla is fighting to change and extend it)...in most areas, you pay no where near the fuel tax, which is intended to pay for the roads you drive on. There has been some move to increase registration fees but so far, it's not nearly as much as the gas tax collected.
So how much does a Tesla wear out and degrade the roads?
Seriously? Why would it be any different than any other vehicle the same weight?
Point being that most roads are designed for heavy truck traffic. The extra costs for building roads are due to truck traffic.
If it wasn't for the heavy truck traffic roads would last a lot longer.
So EV's and really any autos impact on road degradation is minimal.
The exception being maybe a local road in a housing subdivision that wasn't designed to carry massive weights to begin with.
That is why you will see posted weight limits on local roads.
Just about everything you use in life comes by truck. How do you propose to pay for roads once everyone is using EV's and no longer paying fuel taxes? Right now EV's owners are getting a free ride. That can't continue forever.
Majority of road degradation comes from heavy trucks so it only makes sense they pay to rebuild them.
Somebody's Equinox or Escape isn't tearing up the highways. Reisender wrote:
Continue with petrol tax and any shortfall can come from other taxation including income or sales tax.
What do you propose?
Road taxes alone are insufficient anyway....
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-california-gas-tax-increase-road-repairs-20190620-story.html
So we will need to lean on sales and income taxes anyway.
What do you propose? Ban EVs and double the gas tax? (see article)wilber1 wrote:
NJRVer wrote:
wilber1 wrote:
NJRVer wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
time2roll wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
Really? What line on your 1040 relates to the EV surcharge?
Because they are taxing me to fund a rebate for you to buy one...you want to buy one, fine...if the company survives, great...but when you make me pay for it, I get say.
BTW any tax credit to Tesla Buyers ENDS December 31, 2019.
Others beat me to it.
Even with the tax credit coming to an end (tesla is fighting to change and extend it)...in most areas, you pay no where near the fuel tax, which is intended to pay for the roads you drive on. There has been some move to increase registration fees but so far, it's not nearly as much as the gas tax collected.
So how much does a Tesla wear out and degrade the roads?
Seriously? Why would it be any different than any other vehicle the same weight?
Point being that most roads are designed for heavy truck traffic. The extra costs for building roads are due to truck traffic.
If it wasn't for the heavy truck traffic roads would last a lot longer.
So EV's and really any autos impact on road degradation is minimal.
The exception being maybe a local road in a housing subdivision that wasn't designed to carry massive weights to begin with.
That is why you will see posted weight limits on local roads.
Just about everything you use in life comes by truck. How do you propose to pay for roads once everyone is using EV's and no longer paying fuel taxes? Right now EV's owners are getting a free ride. That can't continue forever.
What do you propose?- wilber1Explorer
NJRVer wrote:
wilber1 wrote:
NJRVer wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
time2roll wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
Really? What line on your 1040 relates to the EV surcharge?
Because they are taxing me to fund a rebate for you to buy one...you want to buy one, fine...if the company survives, great...but when you make me pay for it, I get say.
BTW any tax credit to Tesla Buyers ENDS December 31, 2019.
Others beat me to it.
Even with the tax credit coming to an end (tesla is fighting to change and extend it)...in most areas, you pay no where near the fuel tax, which is intended to pay for the roads you drive on. There has been some move to increase registration fees but so far, it's not nearly as much as the gas tax collected.
So how much does a Tesla wear out and degrade the roads?
Seriously? Why would it be any different than any other vehicle the same weight?
Point being that most roads are designed for heavy truck traffic. The extra costs for building roads are due to truck traffic.
If it wasn't for the heavy truck traffic roads would last a lot longer.
So EV's and really any autos impact on road degradation is minimal.
The exception being maybe a local road in a housing subdivision that wasn't designed to carry massive weights to begin with.
That is why you will see posted weight limits on local roads.
Just about everything you use in life comes by truck. How do you propose to pay for roads once everyone is using EV's and no longer paying fuel taxes? Right now EV's owners are getting a free ride. That can't continue forever. - Yosemite_Sam1Explorer
NJRVer wrote:
ShinerBock wrote:
time2roll wrote:
What taxes are marked to have the military deployed around the globe to keep oil flowing. Why does this continue when we import so little oil?
Because it was a false assumption that we keep the military around the to keep oil flowing. It was just propaganda used by certain people to pander to political sides. As you say, we import little oil now, but our military is still involved in these places so the assumption that it is for oil is invalid. Although it is kind of funny that a certain political party president can attack a region for a certain reason and not one word is said about lying or it being for oil. However, if the opposite political party did it less than five years later using the same exact reason, all of the sudden they are lying and doing it for oil.time2roll wrote:
What taxes are charged to clean up the oil spills and clean the air from petrol?
The companies that spill the oil are mainly the ones who are forced to pay for the clean up. As far as air goes, everyone who is buying a gas vehicle is paying for its better emissions when they buy it.
As far as cleaning the air goes, there are companies such as Carbon Engineering that have the backing of people like Bill Gates that are working to pull carbon from the air and make fuel out of it. They have stated that they could even pull more carbon than what is being put into the air by the fuel. However, they will need ICE vehicles around to buy the fuel so it can pay for the infrastructure. Without ICE, they would likely not have enough money to reverse the amount of carbon in the air.
Better tell Trump to get the ships out of the Strait of Hormuz and not worry about protecting the oil in Syria then.
Good idea since Arabs are using the propaganda for the reason for our presence in the Middle East.
Wait, Trump actually said that, our troops will be guarding the oil in Syria insrtead of fighting with our allies the Kurds but allowed by him to be massacred by the Turks. - JRscoobyExplorer II
stsmark wrote:
There was an article in the Semi thread a couple months back about the Hyundai future truck. The VP of Engineering made a statement regarding the Tesla Semi will be in violation of Fed bridge limits regarding weight versus wheelbase he said they forgot to allow for this. There was also a Euro reg regarding front overhang that apparently it and the Nikola are out of spec. So they can’t go into city areas.
Anybody else pick up on that?
Would have to check into that bridge law thing. A normal tractor/semi-trailer is only allowed 46,000 on the front 3. (34 on drives, 12 on steer) And it only takes 13 feet between the first and last axle of the tractor to bridge that 46. That 13 feet would be a real short tractor. Normally when you have problems with bridge law is short trailer or permit loads. To gross 80 on 5 axles you need 51 feet first to last. Most freight boxes are 53 overall - NJRVerExplorer
ShinerBock wrote:
time2roll wrote:
What taxes are marked to have the military deployed around the globe to keep oil flowing. Why does this continue when we import so little oil?
Because it was a false assumption that we keep the military around the to keep oil flowing. It was just propaganda used by certain people to pander to political sides. As you say, we import little oil now, but our military is still involved in these places so the assumption that it is for oil is invalid. Although it is kind of funny that a certain political party president can attack a region for a certain reason and not one word is said about lying or it being for oil. However, if the opposite political party did it less than five years later using the same exact reason, all of the sudden they are lying and doing it for oil.time2roll wrote:
What taxes are charged to clean up the oil spills and clean the air from petrol?
The companies that spill the oil are mainly the ones who are forced to pay for the clean up. As far as air goes, everyone who is buying a gas vehicle is paying for its better emissions when they buy it.
As far as cleaning the air goes, there are companies such as Carbon Engineering that have the backing of people like Bill Gates that are working to pull carbon from the air and make fuel out of it. They have stated that they could even pull more carbon than what is being put into the air by the fuel. However, they will need ICE vehicles around to buy the fuel so it can pay for the infrastructure. Without ICE, they would likely not have enough money to reverse the amount of carbon in the air.
Better tell Trump to get the ships out of the Strait of Hormuz and not worry about protecting the oil in Syria then. - NJRVerExplorer
Huntindog wrote:
NJRVer wrote:
Huntindog wrote:
Lynnmor wrote:
Yes, they get rebates, often get cheaper plates(depends on state) do not pay highway use taxes, and get to use the carpool lanes anytime.time2roll wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
Really? What line on your 1040 relates to the EV surcharge?
Because they are taxing me to fund a rebate for you to buy one...you want to buy one, fine...if the company survives, great...but when you make me pay for it, I get say.
BTW any tax credit to Tesla Buyers ENDS December 31, 2019.
The bottom line where the total tax is listed is where the hogs come to the trough.
Hopefully the rebates come to an end and then taxes are collected to fund the highways.
As usual, those at the trough do not see anything wrong with this.
It is real easy to be liberal with other peoples money.
Sure is, just ask the Defense Dept.
I only speakn English.
The defense dept. sees to it that I do not have to learn another language.
I like our defense dept. You should too.
Never said I didn't.
What's the defense dept. have to do with speaking English?
They actually need a lot more people who speak other languages. - Just saying the government spends tons of money in areas I don't like either. If that spending were to stop there would be no reduction in taxes.
Same for the EV credit. Taxes will not change if/when the tax credit is stopped or it expires.
Any time the government wants to eliminate the second home interest deduction that is OK too. Actually first home deduction can go too.
But this thread is about towing not taxing ;)
About Travel Trailer Group
44,047 PostsLatest Activity: May 12, 2015