anutami
Mar 16, 2021Explorer III
Wolf Creek 890
Pretty sure my friend is picking up one of the first 890’s today he is super stoked as am I for him!! On top of that my BIL just bought a used 2016 WC 850 up in WA for 14k what a deal ;)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40d6e/40d6e0f57dcffb86624f62abdaf8d41aa5a1658e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40d6e/40d6e0f57dcffb86624f62abdaf8d41aa5a1658e" alt=""
joeshmoe wrote:
BTW, who drives any long distance with their dump tanks full?
Grit dog wrote:specta wrote:joeshmoe wrote:
The graphics are too much, IMO.
Yep, for me too.
I think they look cool, but, personally, being a purveyor of less than new campers, the more stickers, the less easily sustainable the exterior finish becomes.
Just part of the game though I suppose.
joeshmoe wrote:
Well, that's the thing. It's no AF. WC's are way off from AFs capacities.
BTW, who drives any long distance with their dump tanks full? I alwaYs run empty. Makes no sense to lug all that disposable weight around.
billtex wrote:joeshmoe wrote:Grit dog wrote:
Yeah, the interior layout looks awesome. Knowing how the tanks are positioned on a similar size AF, I'd say the batteries and hot water location just offset the gray and black tanks. Tanks now in front and batteries and hot water in back. If anything, gray/black tanks near the front, if that's the case, would put more weight forward of the axle when they're full, then 2 batteries do. Bottom line it's a TC, it's heavy, go have fun!
Where's the propane bottles hiding though? I looked at a couple other pics and don't see a propane compartment on either side.
Only drawback, IMO is it has a smaller fresh water tank than comparable AF units. Packing as much fresh water as possible is a priority for me for camping without hookups.
Well, that's the thing. It's no AF. WC's are way off from AFs capacities.
BTW, who drives any long distance with their dump tanks full? I alwaYs run empty. Makes no sense to lug all that disposable weight around.
We always leave home with the 50 gal fresh H20 full. It’s got to go somewhere! Not unusual it stays with us until we get home. It’s usually all grey and black by that time.
joeshmoe wrote:Grit dog wrote:
Yeah, the interior layout looks awesome. Knowing how the tanks are positioned on a similar size AF, I'd say the batteries and hot water location just offset the gray and black tanks. Tanks now in front and batteries and hot water in back. If anything, gray/black tanks near the front, if that's the case, would put more weight forward of the axle when they're full, then 2 batteries do. Bottom line it's a TC, it's heavy, go have fun!
Where's the propane bottles hiding though? I looked at a couple other pics and don't see a propane compartment on either side.
Only drawback, IMO is it has a smaller fresh water tank than comparable AF units. Packing as much fresh water as possible is a priority for me for camping without hookups.
Well, that's the thing. It's no AF. WC's are way off from AFs capacities.
BTW, who drives any long distance with their dump tanks full? I alwaYs run empty. Makes no sense to lug all that disposable weight around.
Grit dog wrote:
Yeah, the interior layout looks awesome. Knowing how the tanks are positioned on a similar size AF, I'd say the batteries and hot water location just offset the gray and black tanks. Tanks now in front and batteries and hot water in back. If anything, gray/black tanks near the front, if that's the case, would put more weight forward of the axle when they're full, then 2 batteries do. Bottom line it's a TC, it's heavy, go have fun!
Where's the propane bottles hiding though? I looked at a couple other pics and don't see a propane compartment on either side.
Only drawback, IMO is it has a smaller fresh water tank than comparable AF units. Packing as much fresh water as possible is a priority for me for camping without hookups.
joeshmoe wrote:
Nice. Saw this on Mike's website. I like the layout except batteries and water heater are behind the axle...meh.
specta wrote:joeshmoe wrote:
The graphics are too much, IMO.
Yep, for me too.