Depressing as it will be, maybe we should just plan to stay home this winter because being cooped up in a 1700 sq. ft. house in California is slightly more appealing than being cooped up in a truck camper in a Mexican beach town because at home, at least, there are always projects to complete and better TV programming. Your thoughts, folks?
...there may be a compelling argument siding on avoiding potential regions, where El Nino driven anomalous weather events (mapped by WX people back in October) can put your property (or, life) in danger.
The other side of the coin is "probability" of something anomalous happening in one's snowbirding region (ie. something as benign as miserable rains for 2 or 3 months; or something as threatening as region-wide frequent or prolonged flooding). So, how do you "forecast" bad weather over a small area (a campground; a town; an RV lot) 1 or 2 months from now?
Everyone will have to make up their own minds whether to go or stay home.
These spreadsheet graphs show the frequency of hydro-meteorological disasters by type (drought; flood; other: wind storms and temperature extremes) for La Nina and El Nino years, from 1975 to 2002:
influence of ENSO on disaster frequency-->*the researchers note that the rising frequency of disasters are duse to the greater number of people and wealth moved into high-risk geography & increased reporting of disasters
We will winter in Florida anyway, knowing that on the temperature side, it very generally appears that the part of Florida we will be snowbirding at will experience much warmer temps this January and February than had happened in 2014 and 2015; BUT, we also know that it very generally appears that Florida (the region we will be snowbirding at) will experience much more frequent and prolonged rains during January and February. We contrast these probable scenarios with a Quebec winter (even a relatively warm one): no contest. Better 65~72F and rainy in Florida than 29F~38F and freezing rain weekly in Quebec :B