cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

ANWR Drilling Stopped

Yosemite_Sam1
Explorer
Explorer
I may not be able to go camping there with my RV but it is still in my bucket list of place to see (or go tent. camping).

It might not happen but sure glad to know it will be kept in it's pristine condition.

ANWR Drillling Blocked
64 REPLIES 64

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
NRALIFR wrote:
I guess thatโ€™s where we differ then.

I think itโ€™s entirely reasonable for all contributors to the production of co2 to contribute to its reduction. Thatโ€™s called fairness in my world.

:):)


Sure. Totally agree. But letโ€™s not point fingers at a group of people when we are are belching out twice as much as they are per person. That wouldnโ€™t be fair.

NRALIFR
Explorer
Explorer
I guess thatโ€™s where we differ then.

I think itโ€™s entirely reasonable for all contributors to the production of co2 to contribute to its reduction. Thatโ€™s called fairness in my world.

:):)
2001 Lance 1121 on a 2016 F450 โ€˜Scuse me while I whinge.
And for all you Scooby-Doo and Yosemite Sam typesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..Letโ€™s Go Brandon!!!

ferndaleflyer
Explorer III
Explorer III
Tree Huggers----always got the data to support their beliefs.

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
Wallabyโ€™s chart says it all. China has almost four times the people and yet only has double the emissions.

We canโ€™t really be asking their people to reduce their emissions until we reduce ours by at least half.

Walaby
Explorer II
Explorer II
Think this is more representative of the impact each nation has on the total carbon emissions.

Each country's share of c02 emissions

China is nearly double the US. Im sure they would rather use the per Capita stat.

Mike
Im Mike Willoughby, and I approve this message.
2017 Ram 3500 CTD (aka FRAM)
2019 GrandDesign Reflection 367BHS

Tvov
Explorer II
Explorer II
Interesting way to use statistics... per capita for CO2 emissions, instead of simply who is polluting more.
_________________________________________________________
2021 F150 2.7
2004 21' Forest River Surveyor

NRALIFR
Explorer
Explorer
Depending on whoโ€™s data you reference, there are 10-12 countries that have emissions per capita higher than the US. The current leader in the world is Palau with >59 tons per capita. But their global contribution is near zero.

You said per capita is โ€œthe only fair wayโ€ to look at CO2 emissions, and Iโ€™m saying it is not. There are numerous ways to look at it, and per capita is just one of them. If the goal is to reduce global emissions, then you donโ€™t leave out the biggest contributor to global emissions thatโ€™s also increasing at the highest rate.

If per capita were were the only fair way, then itโ€™s clear what the US should do to make ourselves look better. Make more babies. Fertility drugs and viagra all around!

:):)
2001 Lance 1121 on a 2016 F450 โ€˜Scuse me while I whinge.
And for all you Scooby-Doo and Yosemite Sam typesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..Letโ€™s Go Brandon!!!

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
NRALIFR wrote:
If per-capita emissions are the only fair way to do it, why are the dozen or so countries who have higher emissions per capita than the US left of that chart?

I donโ€™t agree with that assertion of fairness. The biggest contributors to global CO2 are the countries with the largest emissions numbers, of which the US is one. But China is at the top of that list. Itโ€™s more than double the emissions of the US, and any attempt to obscure that fact is misrepresentation.

:):)


Because, as the chart states, it is emissions by Capita.

Yes, China emissions are twice as high as the US, but they have four times the population.

NRALIFR
Explorer
Explorer
If per-capita emissions are the only fair way to do it, why are the dozen or so countries who have higher emissions per capita than the US left off of that chart?

I donโ€™t agree with that assertion of fairness. The biggest contributors to global CO2 are the countries with the largest emissions numbers, of which the US is one. But China is at the top of that list. Itโ€™s more than double the emissions of the US, and any attempt to obscure that fact is misrepresentation.

:):)
2001 Lance 1121 on a 2016 F450 โ€˜Scuse me while I whinge.
And for all you Scooby-Doo and Yosemite Sam typesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..Letโ€™s Go Brandon!!!

ferndaleflyer
Explorer III
Explorer III
I sure would like to see what you "adapt" proponents would do if your job suddenly disappeared. Nothing else here. Move I guess at this age from where you have spent your whole life to find a job paying 1/2 what you make now in a place you can't stand? Easy for those not affected, or independently wealthy to say that.

Reisender
Nomad
Nomad
RV daytrader wrote:
Problem is....no matter how much the United State cuts back on emissions, the biggest polluters are Russia, China ,India and they wont stop. So our sacrifice will not do much at all.


Nope. By Capita, which is the only fair way to do it, The US, Australia and Canada are the pigs of the planet. I think Austrailia has moved into "the lead" now.

F-TROUP
Explorer
Explorer
"Free market" pretty sure that's not what the Fed's policy is going forward.

RV_daytrader
Explorer
Explorer
Problem is....no matter how much the United State cuts back on emissions, the biggest polluters are Russia, China ,India and they wont stop. So our sacrifice will not do much at all.
YODA...our lil Toyota!
1989 Toyota Seabreeze

Durb
Explorer
Explorer
It seems that those who want to keep the arctic tundra in pristine condition have no problems putting up wind turbines everywhere. Try driving the east end of the Columbia River Gorge. The wind turbines destroying the beautiful vistas are truly a disgusting blight.

enblethen
Nomad
Nomad
Many of the solar and wind farms need workers including truck drivers and equipment operators during the construction. Some of the projects looks not to be completed for five to ten years. Power line contractors are needing truck drivers and equipment operators for extending transmission lines.

Bud
USAF Retired
Pace Arrow


2003 Chev Ice Road Tracker