3oaks wrote:
Mortimer Brewster wrote:
It’s not all bad. Fire is actually beneficial to grasslands. It speeds nutrients to the soil and suppresses tree encroachment.
With that statement, it is very apparent you are not familiar with that part of SW South Dakota at all. :R
It is in the Black Hills of SD, not prairie grass lands. Picture mountains with thick forests of Black Pine and Oak trees and meadows. :@
Actually I have been there many times. Here is a picture I took in Custer State Park when I was last there in 2015. Those wacky buffalo must have eaten most of the trees. Now that i think about it, I'm fairly certain the buffalo in Custer State Park eat grass, not trees. I couldn't get the mountains in the shot, as they are about 400 miles to the west.
The fire is affecting both forested areas and grasslands in the area. Here is a satellite view showing the location of the fire as of Wednesday morning. As you can see, the land is not completely forested in the fire zone.
The point of my original post was that an occasional wildfire isn't necessarily a bad thing. The forested areas will recover, though it will certainly not be as scenic for a time. The buffalo will have a tougher winter than normal.