โMar-21-2018 07:19 AM
โJun-26-2018 08:40 AM
โJun-26-2018 04:41 AM
kknowlton wrote:I agree!
Goes to show you - different strokes for different folks!
โJun-22-2018 06:48 PM
โJun-10-2018 07:22 PM
2gypsies wrote:X2
Here's a photo of the place. .... and folks think Fishing Bridge in Yellowstone which has trees is a parking lot.... this is even more so without trees. It would definitely not be a place for us. We'd take a national forest dry campground in its place!
https://www.google.com/maps/uv?hl=en&pb=!1s0x885bf6c5c15050b5:0x956a1cc66b1f213d!2m22!2m2!1i80!2i80!...
โJun-10-2018 06:54 PM
โMay-09-2018 07:56 AM
dodge guy wrote:DrewE wrote:ro_sie wrote:
Doesnt really matter to me if it is an add or what. I went to that parks website, read everything they had on it, and guess what? I DO NOT WANT TO GO THERE. Don't get me wrong, I like rules, but these "lovely people" want to be able to take pictures of guests and then be able to use them in their advertisements.
I highly doubt they're the only ones getting photo releases. If they did not do that, then any brochure picture in which you (or anyone else) was recognizable would become grounds for a lawsuit. Many many venues and so forth have such clauses on their tickets etc. It's more about general pictures that you happen to be in, rather than a direct portrait with a fabricated endorsement or something.
I haven't looked at the rules, so it may be that they are rule-happy and overly strict for all I know.
Yep, just about any campground does that!
โMay-09-2018 04:23 AM
โMay-09-2018 03:51 AM
โApr-28-2018 12:02 PM
dodge guy wrote:
Anchor down doesn't need to place an ad here on RV.net. they have plenty of people staying there. It`s a very very nice place. worthy of any good reviews or recommendations they get. even those that came across it searching for campgrounds!
โApr-28-2018 06:49 AM
โApr-23-2018 09:44 AM
โApr-23-2018 04:46 AM
DrewE wrote:ro_sie wrote:
Doesnt really matter to me if it is an add or what. I went to that parks website, read everything they had on it, and guess what? I DO NOT WANT TO GO THERE. Don't get me wrong, I like rules, but these "lovely people" want to be able to take pictures of guests and then be able to use them in their advertisements.
I highly doubt they're the only ones getting photo releases. If they did not do that, then any brochure picture in which you (or anyone else) was recognizable would become grounds for a lawsuit. Many many venues and so forth have such clauses on their tickets etc. It's more about general pictures that you happen to be in, rather than a direct portrait with a fabricated endorsement or something.
I haven't looked at the rules, so it may be that they are rule-happy and overly strict for all I know.
โApr-22-2018 05:53 PM
ro_sie wrote:
Doesnt really matter to me if it is an add or what. I went to that parks website, read everything they had on it, and guess what? I DO NOT WANT TO GO THERE. Don't get me wrong, I like rules, but these "lovely people" want to be able to take pictures of guests and then be able to use them in their advertisements.
โApr-22-2018 05:44 PM